User talk:MikeRodent

Message for Babelstone,

I see you have just deleted my revisions for this page.

I added them because the previous state of the page was very unclear ... except to those who already understand how UTF encoding works.

There are quite a few things to say about UTF-16, but the most important thing is to give a lucid, unambiguous explanation to someone who doesn't yet know how it works.

It's difficult to understand, for example, how the fact of "invalid surrogate pairs" could be deemed so unworthy of interest. But actually evoking it fleshes out as required the previous excessively concise explanation of how these pairs work.

MikeRodent (talk) 18:32, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

WP:TALK and Talk:UTF-16
MikeRodent, I suggest you take a moment and read the Wikipedia talk page guidelines, and consider how your recent comments on Talk:UTF-16 measure up against them, particularly the guidelines about good practices, unacceptable behavior and editing others' comments. Welcome to Wikipedia, and please don't let the discussion surrounding your maiden contributions to UTF-16 put you off further contributions! RossPatterson (talk) 01:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)