User talk:MikeYates

Pseudo Quadraphonics
22:30, 8 October 2005, I put this paragraph up into Quadraphonic sound. What remains of it is in Hafler circuit. I was then 84.220.35.62 Tiscali dial-up internet (8Kb/s) in Somerset, England.

"Passive Pseudo Quad" can be much more realistic than would appear from the name. It has been observed that ambient sounds in a concert, such as applause or even coughs from the audience, are generally received in "opposite phase" by the stereophonic microphones, while sound from the musicians is generally in "syncronous phase". Thus, if rear speakers are fed with the difference between the stereo channels, audience noises and echoes from the auditorium can be heard from behind the listener. This can be most easily achieved by wiring two similar additional rear speakers in series (typically 8+8=16 ohms) between the live feeds to the front speakers. The "crosstalk" or loss of stereo separation in the front speakers is less than 2dB while the rear sound level in a typical stereo-recorded live performance is about 7dB below the front, but clearly audible. This "passive" method is arguably as good as any of the expensive "active matrix" electronic decoders which attempt to reconstruct ambient sound from a stereo recording.

Speedy deletion of Left Hand of the Electron
A tag has been placed on Left Hand of the Electron requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 19:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Tristar Worldwide
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tristar Worldwide, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://us.tristarworldwide.com/discover-tristar/about-us.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:30, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tristar Worldwide
Hello MikeYates,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tristar Worldwide for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. rayukk &#124; talk 10:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Tristar Worldwide
Hello, I see another user has speedily deleted your article Tristar Worldwide but I wanted to respond to the question you left on the talk page prior to deletion:
 * The content from www.tristarworldwide.com is reproduced with the owner's permission. I am a retired employee of Tristar Worldwide Ltd and I have been requested to create this page by them because Wikipedia rules prohibit serving officers of the company to do so. Please let me know if I need to quote their permission here? --MikeYates (talk) 10:58, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * To directly address your question regarding copyrights, please see Donating copyrighted materials -- in short you would need the text concerned to be explicitly made available under an appropriate license. That said, please remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and material published must be written from a neutral point of view, in an encyclopedic fashion with appropriate references, and the subject of articles must meet relevant notability guidelines. Regarding having been "requested to create this page" I would also advise you read Conflict of interest. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 11:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tristar Worldwide


A tag has been placed on Tristar Worldwide requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gronk Oz (talk) 12:25, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Difference between this article and Addison Lee
I noted your comment that this article has been deleted previously, while the article about competitor Addison Lee remains. I suggest you take a close look at the two articles, and compare them against Wikpedia's notability guidelines. In particular, take a look at the list of References in that article, and compare against the complete lack of references in Tristar Worldwide. Before trying to create another article, you need to gather references about the subject. To establish notability, most of these need to be detailed coverage in reliable sources which are independent of the company. To have a better chance of an article that "sticks", I recommend the process at Your first article--Gronk Oz (talk) 12:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tristar Worldwide


A tag has been placed on Tristar Worldwide, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 13:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)