User talk:Mike 06

Your draft article, Draft:Planetisation


Hello, Mike 06. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Planetisation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:27, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Planetisation (April 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DocumentError was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Planetisation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Planetisation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Planetisation Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DocumentError&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Planetisation reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

&#32;DocumentError (talk) 15:10, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Planetisation (April 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Planetisation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Planetisation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Planetisation Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Planetisation reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:09, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Mike 06. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Planetisation, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:35, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Connection to the topic?
Hi , welcome to Wikipedia. Please take a moment to describe your connection to the topic "Planetisation". Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi , thanks for your message. my connection with the topic is my research and interest in the work of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. please visit my user page. best regards ~ Mike 06 (talk) 15:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, . I'm just surprised about the strong focus on the topic, since most of your Wikipedia contributions since 2006 seem to be about this topic. I wonder if there might be a conflict of interest (COI) that makes you overestimate the notability of the term, since "editors with a COI are sometimes unaware of whether or how much it has influenced their editing."(WP:COI)
 * I assume that the focus may be of an ideological / missionary nature, in a way that comes close to promotion. Not for a commercial cause, but for a greater good that is unrelated to building a neutral encyclopedia.
 * I'm not entirely sure, though. Just, please, if a topic turns out to be "not notable", consider accepting this decision instead of repeatedly challenging it. The community is very hesitant towards neologisms: "these articles are often created in an attempt to use Wikipedia to increase usage of the term". If that is the motivation for creating the article, please don't do so.
 * Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi ToBeFree, i appreciate the work of those who dedicate time and mindful precision to edit/review articles. Thus Wikipedia can grow. The notability and relevance of an article depends foremost on its topic and content. The topic (lemma) describes a notable and important historic megatrend - at least for experts with knowledge in related scientific fields. This is why i added the topic - which of course is a focus of my research. To assume (publicly) that this creates an ‘ideological’ or ‘missionary’ bias is quite strange and frankly insulting. Have you read and understood the article - using a scientific mind? Can you describe in any way a relevance for your “assumption”? Are you experienced with similar topics that you have edited or reviewed until now? Please feel free to answer these questions. best regards : Mike 06 (talk) 02:53, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Planetisation


Hello, Mike 06. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Planetisation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)