User talk:Mike Aparicio

The word "pseudo-science" is a new form of inquisitorial response, used to antagonize authors or thinkers which express and search for new ideas, in response to the inability of pure science to answer many fundamental questions. Rupert Sheldrake's concepts on the interconnection of the Universe is plainly a philosophical proposition, within the metaphysical intention of finding answers to obvious phenomena which science cannot explain. Why is it the emergence of a reactive force trying to suppress speculation, alternative thinking, parallel theorizing, in a form which is offensive, detracting and ridiculing?

Most of the current scientific paradigms were subject to similar and stronger repressive actions in the past. But skeptic minds do not want alternative thinking to spread and is acting in an inquisitorial mood. the attacks on Sheldrake's concepts ignore the fact it is NOT the whole scientific community which finds Sheldrake as a "pseudo-science" author. John A. Jungerman for instance, who is a connoted physicist has written the book World in Process: Creativity and Interconnection in the New Physics, where the reader finds interesting concepts which depart from the pragmatic scientific current of thought. Is it then forbidden, according to current canonical thought, to express new visions and concepts beyod what is "accepted" by a certain part of the scientific community?--Mike Aparicio (talk) 17:16, 4 October 2013 (UTC)