User talk:Mike Halterman/archive17

DAYS
I think there are a lot of sources on the net that have mixed views on the creators of Days, on one I read Irna Phillips, Ted Corday and Alan Chase created it, on many of them they do state that Irna Phillips co-created it but they're probably getting mixed up with the roles seeing as Irna Phillips was story editor. Anyway I think the Brits have rather beaten the Americans with their soaps, but I am quite partial to a dose of classic 1950s/1960s As The World Turns but I think they now fail to use the veterans. . Ms.raymond, 8.30pm

Accusations
Not sure what exactly you mean by that. A valid idiom for what, and especially given the context. If you look here it doesnt help so perhaps you would care to source your claim. If not then do assume good faith on my part and contemplate how you would feel if someone said murder has been committed and you had got away with it etc, SqueakBox 15:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Happy Easter
Hey, sorry I missed you - and sorry I'm working so I'm not online for long to chat....but have a happy Easter!! NickBurns 15:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Dear Mike...
Hi, Mike. This is  Real96 . I sincerely apologize what occurred on the #wikipedia channel. I hope you find it in your heart to forgive me and my actions if my comments were out of hand in the IRC channel. I kind of have a sense of humor, and I guess emotions don't travel very well on the internet. (sad I know) You are a very good contributor off and on IRC. And, I look forward to working with you on Flavor of Love Girls: Charm School. Best wishes!  Real96  02:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi Mike
Hooray for summer school. I will not be in Tampa because of it. Heh. Thanks for the message on Facebook - that cheered me up. :) This is just a friendly note to say hello. --Strangerer (Talk) 06:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Damian Spinelli
Hi Mike, thank you for rating the Damian Spinelli article at B-class. I saw in your edit summary that you couldn't nominate it for GA because it needed "more work," but you didn't specify just what that work was. Could you please be more specific on the talkpage? Thanks, Elonka 15:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Your Comments
Hello Mike... About the message you left, regarding enlarging pics over 300px. I do agree that the Frances Reid pic was enlarged, however I never enlarged the Alice Hoton picture. I hope that you were aware of this before you took the time to make such an issue of the whole thing. Thank You.User talk:71.125.197.175

Non-free use disputed for Image:2much2little.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:2much2little.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Deletion debates of a few supercouples within the scope of Wikipedia: Wiki Project Soap Operas
A few articles within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas have been nominated for deletion. But this is before we've gotten around to truly improving these particular articles. At this rate, if these articles are more so targeted because they are soap opera couple articles, I find it very off, given that these articles are a work in progress. I was hoping that you could lend your voice on this matter in their deletion debates, as I will contact all participants of Wikipedia: WikiProject Soap Operas to weigh in on this matter as well. I do not believe that getting rid of these or any supercouple articles on Wikipedia is the answer, improving them is.

So far, I know of three true supercoupe articles nominated for deletion:


 * Alan Quartermaine and Monica Bard


 * Victor Newman and Nikki Reed.


 * Nicholas Newman and Sharon Collins. Flyer22 14:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

DOOL
Sure, I'll add it to my watchlist and start participating on the talkpage. :) --Elonka 07:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey, Mike, why did you remove the image of Bill and Susan Hayes as Doug and Julie Williams on the cover of Time Magazine from the supercouple article? I saw that you put the words "Notable couple" as to your reason, but I'm not completely sure what you meant by that. That it somehow doesn't belong in that section? Or that it is because at least two citations are needed near the mention of Doug and Julie's name in that section?

Oh, and also, if there's no huge objection from other editors here within the Wikipedia: WikiProject Soap Operas, I'm going to expand the Supercouple article a little. I feel that since supercouples exist in real life, a portion of the article should be dedicated to celebrity supercouples, past and present. After all, the term supercouple isn't limited to soap operas alone. And these days, supercouples seem to be more prevalent in celebrity couples than the fictional couples. I'll also add an external link to each fictional supercouple on the main supercouple list just like this: I feel that besides making the list more "solid" upon glance without necessarily having to enter the article, this will also deter new editors from just adding a couple that they like when that couple isn't "notable"...especially editors who only sign up here to add their favorite couple to the list that has no notability. This way, if they notice that -- unlike all of the other couples on the list -- they don't have an external link in which to validate the claim that the couple they want to add is a supercouple, they may not add the couple. Flyer22 01:25, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

World's first soap opera supercouple?
Mike, I've beem meaning to address this for a while, but Doug and Julie being soap opera's first supercouple seems to be disputed, like with this link:

But, then, with this link here......it states "So popular did Doug & Julie become (while involved with a triangle with her own mother Addie), that the duo became what is considered the very first soap opera supercouple" -- so which couple is it?

Is it that the first one mentioned was the unofficial first supercouple in soap operas, but the second one mentioned was the official first? Flyer22 02:18, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

re: DOOL
One of the things that I have been thinking about in planning to restructure the Y&R article for the past couple of weeks, and this applies to the DOOL article, is trying to model it after current FA's such as Arrested Development and Buffy the Vampire Slayer. There should be some sort of sections about storylines, production, cast, characters, and in popular culture - which I believe you have already started.

Thoughts that jump to my mind immediately:
 * I am pretty sure those on FAC will want more citations on the Ratings and scheduling history section
 * I am also pretty sure that some will want "fair use" rationale explainations on the image pages of those screenshots of the title sequence.
 * It might be worthwhile to go through the List of Friends episodes and give the specific episodes where DOOL is referenced.

If I think of more, I will let you know. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Mike, sorry I haven't been able to do much with the peer review this week. I've been busy with work stuff, and my time on Wikipedia has been limited.  I may have more time this weekend though, and will definitely try to dig back in.  :) --Elonka 22:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Expanded on the supercouple article

 * It took me longer than I had initially planned, but I finally expanded on the supercouple article.

Also, I edited this statement out of the soap opera section of the supercouple article -- "and thousands of people called NBC as well as their local affiliates to petition for the right for Doug and Julie to marry, since the actors were married already" -- because I couldn't find the citation for it.

If we find the citation for it, then of course that part of the article can be edited back in.

Later. Flyer22 12:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Newyorkspit.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Newyorkspit.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 21:45, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Mike
Mike, I know that you're busy working on improving the Days of our Lives article, but I wanted to inform you on some of what User:Anetode and I are discussing in concerns to the supercouple article, which you can read on my user page. Here's the link... Flyer22 09:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Neverbeenmellow.jpg
I have tagged Image:Neverbeenmellow.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Bigr Tex  18:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Letmeknow.jpg
I have tagged Image:Letmeknow.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Bigr Tex  18:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Bob and Lisa Hughes
Hey, Mike. Um, I saw that you called out Bob and Lisa Hughes as not being a supercouple in one of your edits within their article. Well, Markt3 seems to believe that they were or should be considered a supercouple, as I'm sure you know from having edited the Bob and Lisa article Markt3 edited in as well, and I was wonderding what do you feel should be done about this matter of this most recent edit of Bob and Lisa within the Supercouple article. I left a message, this link... on Markt3's talk page, and stated that I will re-word this most recent edit as this edit can be seen with this link..., but your comment on this matter would be geatly appreciated by me. Flyer22 08:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Days
Hi Mike. I just wanted to mention that you've done a good job cleaning up the Days article recently. I'll try to make a few more improvements or suggestions when I have more time. Anyway, great work. ×Meegs 07:30, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Coldsunday.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Coldsunday.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Meetup in August
I'm flying into Orlando the night of Thursday, August 16, and leaving early morning on Monday, August 20. I'd like to do a meetup sometime during that weekend (the 17-19). Can you set it up? Raul654 05:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Excellent. It'll be nice to meet sandy, after so much email traffic :) Raul654 01:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * As far as a date, I just found out that my girlfriend is having a housewarming BBQ on Saturday the 18th, so that's definitely out. It'll have to be either Friday or Sunday. Can you find out if Jimbo, Sandy, et al have any preference for those days one way or the other? Also, user:Ryulong is considering coming up from Miami by rail, so whatever place we choose should be accessible from the Tampa Amtrack station. Raul654 04:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * If this is a general meetup I would be interested in seeing everyone again. -- Trödel 17:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Wiki Meetup
Sorry I didn't make the Wiki Meetup in St. Petersburg last week - wish I could have made it. Unfortunately I was fighting bugs and boredom at Camp La-No-Che. -- Trödel 14:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Coldsunday.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Coldsunday.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~ Riana ⁂ 05:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Flipwilson.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Flipwilson.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Donnyandmarie.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Donnyandmarie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Stupid?
I noticed your comment at Alkivar's request for comment about "stupid sniping" - would you care to explain or retract it? Videmus Omnia Talk  04:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry for my idiocy, but you're insulted regarding my request that you retract a comment insinuating that I'm stupid? Please explain. Videmus Omnia Talk  04:51, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Images
I have tagged the following list of images as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description pages. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  05:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Huge (61 files!) spammy list of images collapsed into a list by editing Videmus Omnia's comments, courtesy  Nihiltres ( t .l ) 02:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * List follows:


 * Image:Astheworldturns1981.jpg
 * Image:Texaspic.jpg
 * Image:Famesoundtrack.jpg
 * Image:Fameposter.jpg
 * Image:Kotterdvdcover.jpg
 * Image:Aybsagaindvd.jpg
 * Image:Toomuchheaven.jpg
 * Image:Mammamiasingle.jpg
 * Image:Justshootme.JPG
 * Image:Kateandalliecover.jpg
 * Image:40jahreddr.jpg
 * Image:Betlynch.jpg
 * Image:Anniewalker.jpg
 * Image:Anniewalker2.jpg
 * Image:Emilybishop.jpg
 * Image:Emilyernest.jpg
 * Image:Kenvalerie.jpg
 * Image:Roversbar.jpg
 * Image:Bettyturpin.jpg
 * Image:Alberttatlock.jpg
 * Image:Jivetalkinsingle.jpg
 * Image:Tootieramsey.jpg
 * Image:Ednagarrett.jpg
 * Image:Factsoflifetvguide.jpg
 * Image:Blairwarner.jpg
 * Image:Nataliegreen.jpg
 * Image:Insovietgeorgia.jpg
 * Image:Bradybunchdvdseason4.jpg
 * Image:Chancellorbrinkley.jpg
 * Image:Burninglovecover.jpg
 * Image:Petticoatjunctionscreenshot.jpg


 * Image:Janetreid.jpg
 * Image:Minniecaldwell71.jpg
 * Image:Chachi.jpg
 * Image:Wduv.jpg
 * Image:Srichardson.jpg
 * Image:Elizabethfranz.jpg
 * Image:Familyshoot.jpg
 * Image:ProvidenceDVDcover.jpg
 * Image:Enoughisenough.JPG
 * Image:Irmaogden.jpg
 * Image:Valerieelectrocuted.jpg
 * Image:Raylangton.jpg
 * Image:Jennifermoss.jpg
 * Image:Gunsmoketitlecard.jpg
 * Image:Jazzmancover.jpg
 * Image:Beverleemckinsey.jpg
 * Image:Kimberleysimms.jpg
 * Image:Ellenparker.jpg
 * Image:Melinakanakaredes.jpg
 * Image:Michaelzaslow.jpg
 * Image:Maureengarrett.jpg
 * Image:Oltl1995.jpg
 * Image:Judithmcconnell.jpg
 * Image:Triciacast.jpg
 * Image:Jaimelynbauer.jpg
 * Image:Hall_&_Oates_-_Rich_Girl.ogg
 * Image:Hall_&_Oates_-_Sara_Smile.ogg
 * Image:Hall_&_Oates_-_You_Make_My_Dreams.ogg
 * Image:Nadia's_Theme.ogg
 * Image:Solidgoldintro.jpg

My RFA
Wow. Even foundation members think I should not be an admin :-( Happy editing! -- Boricua  e  ddie  03:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

B&B
Thanks, man. Gridge 19:29, 3 August 2007 (UTC).

Requests for adminship/Elonka 2
Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Wikipedia project, and I'll try again in a few months! If you ever have any questions or suggestions for me, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best wishes, --Elonka 04:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

List of US daytime soap opera ratings
Yeah, I just created the list awhile back to get this cumbersome information out of some of the individual soap articles, and tagged it myself as needing sources. I don't think it's the most important list, but probably notable because many of the soap articles discuss their own historical ratings in some way and a master comparison could be helpful. I was hoping someone else would get around to sourcing it, but I guess I hafta do it myself! TAnthony 03:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Hispanic Americans in World War II
Mike, thank you for your comments. I did what you suggested with the table, at first my main concern was that it would overlape into another section, but it seems to have worked out fine. BTW, Michael, feels that "regardless of their ethnicity and political orientation, all Americans are indeed fools." see:. So, I guess that his ill feelings are towards Americans in general and not towards one group in particular. Thank you once again. Tony the Marine 18:01, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Atlanta Wikimania bid IRC meeting
Hello, The first of likely many IRC meetings to coordinate the Atlanta Wikimania bid is being held tonight (Aug 23) at 7:00PM EST in #wikimania-atlanta on irc.freenode.com. If you can, it would be great if you could log on. If not, I am sure there will be plenty more times to discuss the bid :). --Cspurrier 14:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * If you can make it, the second of likely a long series of IRC meetings is being held Friday (Aug 24) at 7:00PM EDT in #wikimania-atlanta on irc.freenode.com. --Cspurrier 19:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Erin Moran
No, that's the sanest looking picture I got of her. True, Joanie Cunningham wouldn't look like that, but the article's about Erin, not Joanie, and that's how Erin looked. Wryspy 06:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I attended one panel at which researchers were analyzing fans and professionals who come to Comic-Con. One specifically commented on how odd it was that certain celebrities trying to get every ounce out of their old fame that they can come to Comic-Con even in cases when their body of work has nothing whatsoever to do with the convention. That researcher specifically cited Erin Moran, wondering why she was there. Wryspy 07:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * A psychologist I know has looked at things she has said over the years as well as her body language, and feels that she is likely . . . wait a minute, maybe I shouldn't say this in a public forum. Wryspy 07:17, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I just e-mailed you. I don't use Instant Messenger. Wry Spy 07:31, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikimania Atlanta
Yes, I would love to help out! I live in Augusta. My mother in law is in the hospital (and has been for 3 weeks) so I have not been online a lot. Please feel free to get in touch and tell me specifically what you need me to do. My email is dorothybaez@yahoo.com. Dorothy Kernaghan-Baez 15:30, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Mike -- I would happily support the bid, but my time limits any active participation on my part. Michael 05:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)