User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 3

Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

GA nomination
Mike. I've nominated your article on Lovell Telescope for assessment as a "Good Article". I'm sure it's on your watchlist in case they need any 'tweaks' to improve it. Let me know if you have any comments. Best wishes. Peter. Peter I. Vardy 16:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Mike Peel 21:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Re Category:Deprecated templates, etc.
Hi again Mike,
 * ''I've have put forward a proposal to rename (and repurpose) Category:Deprecated templates to a temporary holding category; see Categories for discussion/Log/2007 May 7...

Thanks for your notification; having seen the generally unfavourable response, I thought I'd mention here that I've always taken the "Deprecated templates" category to imply your rationale (i.e. to be replaced/deleted) regardless of name. It's a useful reminder, though, to return to ' immediate subcategories... Hope all well, David (talk) 03:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


 * ''Regardless of the outcome of the CfD, I'm very tempted to go through the category and remove / redirect templates that aren't in use where possible, possibly even creating a subcategory something like Category:Templates replaced by mediawiki functions. As it stands, the category just looks like clutter to me.


 * Yes, this task is something that can be done regardless of the CfD – but I haven't dared look yet at what its magnitude might be...


 * Also, I noticed FrankB's comment above this about the lack of a clear picture with the template categorization. It would probably be a good idea to put a page together somewhere that gives a rough outline of the aims of categorizing templates, as well as an outline of the category system. I would also like to go through Category:Wikipedia templates by subject, and try to put together a decent set of sub-categories for each of its' sections (again, as a list on some page somewhere). With luck, Category:Uncategorized templates should be filled up fairly shortly (see Bots/Requests for approval/UncatTemplateBot), and it would be good to have a decent category system set up before people (hopefully) start looking to categorize those templates. What do you think? Mike Peel 22:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I was and have been pondering this key issue while populating, toying with the idea of and trying to clarify ' contents further. I suppose it hinges on whether there's consensus over how folk are most likely to use ; whether to find which templates are used in a particular namespace or for a particular kind of task, or perhaps to browse different styles of templates, or to find templates relating to a subject area, etc, etc – in other words, which of the immediate "Wikipedia templates by X" subcategories (and perhaps a couple of the other current immediate subcategories) might be(come) the most used/useful. Whichever that might be – my first thought is "Wikipedia templates by subject area" – my current thinking is that its contents should populate the top level  while the other "by X" categories remain subcategories indexed under [space]. For example:




 * [space]
 * (see this CfD)
 * (..etc...?)
 * (see this CfD)
 * (..etc...?)
 * (see this CfD)
 * (..etc...?)


 * A


 * G


 * H


 * M


 * N


 * P


 * R


 * S


 * Yours, David (talk) 07:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Keshe Theory NOTABLE  New theory about the genration and control of gravitational fields  Notable
Hi Mike I have been advised by Bjelleklang who is from wikipedia help line team and has assisted me up to now to set my user talk to come to this link.

Now I want to bring the user talk to main forum, and he advised me and given me this link to come to physics porthole first, which you are editor of.

I do not know how and the way this topic can be moved to this site for others comments or for it to be moved that it can not be deleted.

Can you please help and let me know if you can assist to bring this in to the right place in physic section.

The link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keshe_Theory.

Thank you in advance. Keshe Theory 12:10, 29 May 2007 (UTC)keshe

Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Templates
Hi Mike, Thank you for fixing the template stuff ! I wasn't aware of that a redirect will damaged the whole history. I realized that my templates add some whitespaces to the article, though this was my very first time I used conditional templates, so unfortunately I wasn't able to resolve this problem. So thanks ! And you're right, next time I will use sandboxes for that.

Maybe you could help me with 2 other problems. I realized that the space betweens linebreaks is much bigger than in the version without a template. Do you know where the problem is ?? The other is, I tried to categorized the template direct in Template:PyhsicsNavigation but it didn't work, I searched for something like Category:Physics_navigation_templates but didn't found anything. Is it possible to use a conditional template or something similar for doing this job ? As it will be easier to have the category stuff direct in the PyhsicsNavigation template instead of writing it separately for every new template ?? Thanks again !

Best Regards, Sheliak —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sheliak (talk • contribs) 20:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi Mike,
 * please see GR history for the old version and the new version GR new which uses the PhysicsNavigation template. The line spacing grows by about 0.5mm on my computer,so that the whole template looks a bit ugly. I would prefer to shrink the line spacing even a bit more than in the previous version. Any ideas ?


 * Sheliak

Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

unfortunately, predictable I suppose
re: this Now you can see first hand why I urge caution on changing things... someone obviously decided to rewrite wikipedia category and didn't give a damn whether a parameter was used or not. Sheesh! How professional!


 * nope just youthful inexperience... seems to need a lesson in boolean operators. Certainly needs to use a sandbox for such overhauls.


 * Have a good summer! How'd the dissertation go? // Fra nkB 00:57, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

templates
re: ''This incident had the side-effect of reminding me about Category:Miscellaneous templates. Do you still have objections to me clearing that template out and deleting it? Category:Uncategorized templates can take over its job of an odd-template drawer - that category has the advantage of not appearing to be a permanent home for templates... Mike Peel 17:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, if you see no relevance to the fact five other sisters use that instead of Uncategorized, I guess not. You seem to be stuck on one way of categorization, so have it as you will. I'm done fighting for and against anything here. Have a good summer // Fra nkB 19:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Unasur templates
Yes, of course. Felipe C.S ( talk ) 17:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Unused templates
Ah ok, thanks for the clarification. In general, empty categories used for maintenance should not be speedy deleted because it is difficult to judge whether or not it is in fact being used by anyone. It may very well be a good idea to delete the category but I'd rather see it go through the proper CfD route just to make sure enough time is given to verify that it is indeed unused. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 19:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Category:University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology
This category is up for deletion review. See Deletion review/Log/2007 June 29. Dr. Submillimeter 22:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know. I've been discussing this category with User:Dodo64 (see their talk page). While I'm unsure what the best way to approach this in the long term is, I think deletion review and a more thorough discussion about the category is the best way to go for now. Mike Peel 22:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Ships navboxes catgeories
I was in talks with Dual Freq, he believed that most of the navboxes should have been placed into the Category:Naval navigational boxes category. The conversation is found on his talk page. —Dispenser 01:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Hello. I've recategorized all of the templates in Category:Ship navigational boxes into Category:Naval navigational boxes, and nominated the former for speedy deletion. The templates probably need further categorization into sub-categories of Category:Naval navigational boxes, but I'll leave that for someone who knows more about naval ships than I do. Thanks for letting me know, and keep up the good work you're doing on the navigational templates! Mike Peel 08:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Being a member of WikiProject Ships, I went ahead and started the process. At this point all of the Australian, Canadian, German, Japanese, UK, and US templates in Category:Naval navigational boxes have been shifted to appropriately named sub-categories.  Thank you for taking care of the initial steps of this process!   --Kralizec! (talk) 19:23, 1 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Great! That's just what was needed. If I come across any more naval templates, I'll make sure that I categorize them into the appropriate sub-category. Thanks for letting me know. Mike Peel 19:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello
Hi, I noticed that you have a normal signature. Would you like a new 2 colored signature? I would be more than happy to make one for you. RuneWiki     777 13:29, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks, but no. I'm quite happy with my "normal" signature - I prefer simplicity over complication. Mike Peel 13:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:59, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

adminship
On a completely unrelated note: have you ever considered a request for adminship? I don't know your work around here so well but you've been around for a year and a half and you seem to be pretty active in various WikiProjects and at WP:TFD so unless you're hiding some kind of skeleton in your wiki-closet, I don't think it would be much of a problem. We can't have too many admins so every trusted user should in principle receive the sysop bit. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 19:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for asking, but I've got more than enough to be doing here without the extra admin duties (and if I finish my current non-article-writing tasks any time soon - which is very unlikely - there's plenty more to do...). Also, with my current task (sorting through Category:Uncategorized templates), it would be very tempting to go OTT with the delete tool to get rid of unused templates, and that's probably not the best way to approach the problem. I'll bear the possibility of requesting adminship in mind, though; maybe I'll give it a go in six months or so. Thanks again. Mike Peel 22:36, 28 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, do as you like. At the risk of insisting though, admin tools can be quite useful when doing all sorts of cleanup, from closing TfD discussions yourself to editing protected templates, having access to deleted pages (and figuring out the history of some complex mess), protecting sensitive templates, etc. The thing is: I'd rather see good trusted users with the sysop bit regardless of whether they intend to use it 200 times a day. At least that's one user who won't add to the admin backlogs! Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 03:44, 29 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I've been thinking this over for the last couple of days, and I've come to the conclusion that requesting adminship would be a good idea - there are some things that it would make easier for me to do (as you say, editing protected templates, etc.), and I can also help out with some of the backlogs requiring an administrator (e.g. speedy deletions, thus adding a bit more variety to what I do here). My concern above about deleting unused templates was probably unwarranted; either passing them through WP:TfD, or turning them into redirects where appropriate, are proving to be the best ways of dealing with them.
 * So, would you be willing to nominate me for adminship? Mike Peel 17:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes I probably would nominate you. I say probably because I don't know you all that well so I'd have to spend just a bit of time going through your edit history to be completely comfortable. So if that's ok with you I'll do that later tonight and will proceed with the nom after that. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 22:14, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * That's fine with me. Thanks! Mike Peel 22:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

 Pascal.Tesson would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Pascal.Tesson to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Requests for adminship/. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

So there's the official template, just fill in answers for the questions and transclude the page on WP:RFA when you're ready. If you take a bit of time to do so, it might be worth updating the edit stats on the nomination's talk page. And on a more personal note, best of luck although I can't really see why you would need it! Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 00:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I've now started running the marathon. Thanks again! Mike Peel 10:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * So much for running the marathon. This is turning out to be a leisurely Sunday morning stroll in the park. Pascal.Tesson 17:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I know; it's almost a bit anti-climatic. :-/ Where's all of the extra questions for me to answer and the hordes of people voting "oppose" (or even not making their minds up)? I was wondering if they've all gone on holiday or something, but they seem to have been vocal enough on other people's RfA's... :-/ Mike Peel 18:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Category:University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology
Hi,

I have closed the DRV on this cat., and restored it per unanimous consensus that its CfD should have been better-attended. I thought you might like to relist, as the original nominator at CfD, since I couldn't make a very compelling case for deletion, and a purely procedural listing at CfD might tend to garner less input. Best wishes, Xoloz 16:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I've now relisted it; see Categories for discussion/Log/2007 July 6. Mike Peel 18:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Sandbox Page
Thanks for the edit on my sandbox page... I didnt know how to exclude a page from a category but keep the link instead. Also forgot about the categories in the page itself. I'll keep an eye on this in the future. Cheers. Sniperz11 16:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Adminship
Congratulations, you are now an administrator - and with almost unanimous support! If you haven't already, now is the time look through the Administrators' how-to guide and Administrators' reading list. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or at the Administrators' noticeboard. Warofdreams talk 13:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Mike Peel 18:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations
Bah, what a boring, uneventful RfA! (Although I'm sure you'll be losing tons of sleep about that one "neutral".) In any case, congratulations on your promotion to the prestigious rank of janitor. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 13:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Congratulations! Politics rule 16:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you, Pascal, both for originally suggesting requesting administration, and for nominating me. Also: thanks to everyone who supported my RfA. I'm not going to partake in the ritual of posting a pretty thank-you box to everyone who supported me's talk page, but am going to get straight down to work... Mike Peel 18:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

My Archives
Er, what made you think I needed help in my Archives? I might have had a 'help' tag, but you would note that its quite old. Thanks for the assist, though. :) - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  06:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I didn't think that you needed help, hence why I turned the transclude into a link: help has now been replaced by a redirect to helpme, so if I hadn't done that then you'd have had someone coming by to help you. The edit summary was for your information, just in case you did still need help. Mike Peel 06:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Alias book cover 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Alias book cover 2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 00:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Alias book cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Alias book cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 00:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Electron aufbau
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Talk:Electron aufbau, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Talk:Electron aufbau fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: talk page of redirect To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Talk:Electron aufbau, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:10, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Feist Sethanon cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Feist Sethanon cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat 15:19, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

RE: Template:Infobox Prison Break season 3 episode list
Ok. Thanks. Ladida 04:36, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 19:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Bot for Templates for deletion
Hi Mike, just a quick note to mention that I have found the problem with my WP:TFD bot; see my talk page for details. Schutz 22:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

That TfD
I noticed you closed that TfD on the Tolkien language stubs, and also deleted the category pages. I also noticed you said at the TfD that I was the main author. I was the creator of the category page, but someone else created the language stub template. I guess you could say that I found a half-finished stub sorting system, created the category page and started using the stub to label pages, but then realised how pointless it was and binned the lot. I used db-author for the category page, but TfD'd the template because I hadn't created it. If you think I should notify the creator, or want to yourself, that is fine. Equally, if you think the close is OK, I'm happy to leave it at that. Just thought I should let you know that I didn't create the template, but came across it while doing some tidying up. Carcharoth 19:35, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

User talk:WarthogDemon/Archive/ARchive 9
I made this page moments ago and as you can see, made a typo. I've made the correctly spelled page, and tagged this but thought it'd be best I officially tell someone this, since U1 is usually not legitimate for talk pages. -WarthogDemon 21:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * For something like that, U1's fine. The issue with talk pages is related to messages left on the page (normally warning messages, e.g. about vandalism), whereas that page has no messages on it. Anyhow, I've deleted the page. Mike Peel 21:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I see. Well, regardless, thanks. :) -WarthogDemon 21:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Quick nuke request
I'm addressing you for the simple reason that you're an admin and around on the recent changes list. Would you mind deleting Talk:List_of_films_by_gory_death_scene, a deleted article's talk page restarted for complaining? Should be trivial. You need not notify the starting anon about policy - I'll explain to him the plans for revising it into an acceptable form and bringing it back, which should get a more positive response. --Kizor 19:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. Mike Peel 19:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Quick and professional. Thank you! --Kizor 20:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[[Image:WikiThanks.png|right]]

Category:Articles for deletion templates
Hello. I noticed you've been categorizing some of the afd templates into this category. Would you mind removing these categories from Template:Afd2 starter and Template:Afd3 starter (and other similar templates)? When these are preloaded, the noinclude text is included on the page and is causing deletion debates to appear in the template category. Thanks. --- RockMFR 01:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi. I've removed the category from those two templates. I'll run through the category shortly and remove the category from all of the AfD pages, and will keep an eye on the category to make sure there's no other templates that are also causing the problem. Then I'm off to file a bug report. Thanks for letting me know. Mike Peel 08:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The category's now been removed from all AfD pages it was on. Also, there is a bug report concerning this issue at, which has been open since March 2006. :( Mike Peel 09:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Nice close
Nice close on Blpdispute. I was going to close it the same way, and was trying to write up a closing statement, but you worded it very well. IronGargoyle 02:03, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks; that's reassuring as I wasn't 100% sure about how the result would sit with people. Mike Peel 10:02, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

milesian school
hi, my name is Orit and i am a Spanish Hebrew translator. in a Spanish novel i came across a "jónic" school of phylosophy, and consulting the wikipedia in Spanish, found no link to an English or Hebrew equivalent. through the names of the key philosophers i have managed to track down the milesian school, thinking they are one and same. one of the wonderful things about the wikipedia (for a translator) is the possibility to go from an item in one language to the same in another. if indeed i am right and this is the same school (forgive my igonorance in philosophy,) could those terms be linked in spite of the different name? best, o —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.163.21.228 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 2 August 2007
 * Hello. Technically, it's very easy to link the pages: put Milesian school at the bottom of the article on the non-English Wikipedia(s). For more information, see Help:Interwiki linking. I'm afraid that I can't say whether or not the pages should be linked, as I don't know philosophy that well, nor foreign languages. Mike Peel 15:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Jodrell Bank Observatory
Hey, sorry to say that I've failed the GA nomination for Jodrell Bank Observatory. I have added a pretty comprehensive list of things that I feel are wrong about the article on its talk page, hope it helps. All the best, The Rambling Man 16:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. I'll work through your list of issues, and will let you know when they're sorted. Mike Peel 21:23, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:16, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:Pet Species
Hello Mike Peel. You've deleted Template:Pet Species per this TfD. The TfD notice was placed on the template only a few hours before the discussion was closed, thus disrupting Wikipedia's natural consensus building process as users watchlisting it could hardly have the chance to express their opinions about the deletion. Like myself. Please consider overturning your own closure, and perhaps listing the template for deletion again, provided that a notice is placed on it since the very beginning of the discussion. Thank you for your time. Best regards, Hús  ö  nd  14:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Hello. The TfD notice was actually placed on the template on the 28th July, when it was nominated for deletion. If you wish, you can take the template to Deletion review to review the deletion. Mike Peel 14:53, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh. You're right, my mistake. Well, everything seems in order then. Sorry for the trouble. Regards, Hús  ö  nd  15:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Although I'm somewhat frustrated for not having noticed that this was nominated for deletion in all this time. Argh. Hús  ö  nd  15:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

JBO GA re-review
Hey, I'd be glad to look over the article again. Your improvements, on face value, look great already. Just a quick note, Image:Mark V radio telescope model.jpg seems to have a strange template problem on Commons, you ought to attend to that before someone too keen pops by to give you a templated warning! In the meantime, stand by for my re-review. The Rambling Man 16:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've now fixed the template call at the Commons (it was missing a ] ). Mike Peel 16:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * No worries. I've passed the article to GA now, great work.  The Rambling Man 16:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Mike Peel 17:03, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Award seconded, great stuff. The Rambling Man 20:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Mike Peel 08:39, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Infobox Planet Template
Hi, I've made a suggestion for a further refactoring of the way the Infobox Planet template is used at: Template_talk:Infobox_Planet

Do you have any views on this? If you have no objections, I'll just go ahead and do it (since no-one else has commented).

Martin.Budden 16:09, 9 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know about this. I'm sorry that I can't respond to your suggestion in a positive way, and I hope that I've made my issues with your suggestion clear. Mike Peel 18:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)


 * No worries about disagreement. I asked for comment, not positive comment. I've replied to your comment in the template talk page. Note that I probably did not explain my suggestion properly - I was not proposing that we revert to the previous behaviour, but just use a level of indirection. I do accept that your argument about citations seems conclusive, though. Martin.Budden 09:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Jodrell Bank
I enjoyed the article on JBO, so thanks for your work on it. I was looking at it as my father, who is 80, was remenincing about when he was a botany assistant at JB, and Lovell employed the botany assistants to put up posts, and to go on scavaging expeditions to airfields to collect electrical generators. Not got any independent verification of these stories but quite interesting. Maybe I'll see you in the Alan Turing Building?Billlion 09:33, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Administrator categories
Perhaps categories can be created and administrators can voluntarily put their name in such category? Polounit 00:47, 16 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Good suggestion, but I think one or two adminstrators should get the ball rolling on this. --Sadi Carnot 00:55, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

If you need the help of an admin with a knowledge of science at any point, I my be able to assist. Specifically, I'm an astronomer/astrophysicist/physicist. Mike Peel 07:59, 16 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Mike Peel, thanks for the tip. I added you to my: Science admin list.  Ideally, I'd like to see admins grouped per the categories each person likes to do edit in.  Thus, if I was in need of assistance on a knitting article (very unlikely) I could find an admin excited to help out.  Thanks again: --Sadi Carnot 16:56, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

TfD Help
Hi, you closed out the discussion for the Template:Japan dam that I was working on. I was wondering it you wouldn't mind finishing Templates for deletion up, unless of course you feel that there are still open questions. It's been there since August 4th and it's exactly the same thing as the last discussion. It has driven me NUTS! -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 06:37, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. Mike Peel 09:50, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I do appreciate it. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 13:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 20th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Relist
Would you please consider not relisting simple requests on TFD that have met no objections? I'm talking about PD-recycling, which was suggested to be redirected to PD-ineligible. This should really not be a big deal, and we're not running on a quorum. Thanks,  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  08:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Hello. The reason I relisted that template was because it was nominated by an anonymous user (albeit one with a large number of edits), and also because the template was in use on about half a dozen images. In such a case, I decided that there was no downside to relisting the template so that it could be discussed further. The nomination also didn't make it clear what they wanted doing with the template; as such, I assumed it was up for deletion, rather than redirection. Had I thought about redirecting it, then I might have closed it - that's no big deal - but I tend to prefer to err on the side of caution with deletion. Mike Peel 09:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Funny calendar
[quote]deleted "Category:Uncategorized from June 2007" (CSD C1: Category is Empty (and has been for 4 days or more))[/quote] It was actually empty for less than 36 hours before you deleted it. As of Aug 21 - 96 articles left to be categorized. No need to reply as I am just being picky on the minor details of the edit summary. It is too bad that the list keeps growing faster than we are able to clear them out. By the way, thanks for deleting the category, time to start on the next one. Dbiel (Talk) 22:54, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm; I thought it was next week already?
 * In retrospect, I should have deleted that one under housekeeping, rather than catempty. One of the issues I have with that criteria is that there is generally no way to check whether a category has been empty for more than 4 days, which is an issue I'll bring up at WT:CSD right now...
 * Have fun with your categorizing of articles: it's a necessary job, and I'm glad it's (slowly) getting done (unfortunately, I'm generally busy with other things, so can't help out.) Mike Peel 09:54, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Just a note
At this TFD, you said the the template creator supported the move. You meant me. However, I wasn't the template creator. Anyway, it doesn't make that much of a difference. Just letting you know. -- (Review Me) R Parlate Contribs@ (Let's Go Yankees!) 01:48, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah: I assumed that, as EfD is in your userspace, you created all of the templates for it. I won't make a similar assumption again. Thanks for letting me know. Mike Peel 06:24, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3/4 of EFD, including the templates, were created by other people :). -- (Review Me) R Parlate Contribs@ (Let's Go Yankees!) 00:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

CSD AutoReason Updated
Attention spamlist! I've just updated CSD AutoReason to account for the new image deletion page. If you'd just hard refresh (Ctrl+F5 in most browsers), you'll get the new version and be on your way.  ^ demon [omg plz]  17:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:22, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Alias Season 3 DVD.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Alias Season 3 DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 3rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 04:12, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 20:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 17th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:21, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Infobox Planet and categorisation
Hi, yeah, just as I suspected - thanks for the confirmation and link. Moon has the "atmosphere_density" parameter that I was searching for, but no sign of it in the category... Now that I know it's not just something I did wrong, it'll save me thrashing around and trying to find out what's going on. :) Do you mind also pointing this out at Template talk:Infobox Planet? It'll save others wondering, should they come across the post. Deuar 15:17, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:22, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Heat lock request
Mike, can you put a permanent new user page lock on the heat article. It has an average of one vandalism per day (at least 30 per month), and this has been going on for at least a year or two. Thanks: --Sadi Carnot 13:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. Mike Peel 18:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the help. Good work. --Sadi Carnot 18:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 03, 2007


Automatically delivered by COBot 02:39, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Physics portal
The portal:physics needs some new Selected articles and Selected photos through the end of the year. I commented out the auto selector and put up September until this is corrected. 199.125.109.27 20:00, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

image template
I managed to get a job (and thus less time) since I offered to clean up that tag, but I'm taking responsibility for it, and have asked for help. &mdash; Timotab Timothy (not Timdagnabbit!) 02:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)