User talk:Mike Searson/archive9

Thank you
Actually, to the best of my knowledge Glock didn't import the 18 to the US before the May 1986 cut-off, so the only way a civilian can get one (legally anyway) is to be a licensed Class III distributor to LE agencies or the military (dealer samples). Supposedly there are a few prototypes floating around that were imported as dealer samples and then registered, to make them transferable, but I think that's more urban legend than anything. Glock started importing the 18 in late 1986, for demonstration only. I don't believe they actually delivered on any contracts that year, but I'd have to make some calls to be 100% on that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.24.147.114 (talk) 00:44, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Half of all Class III weapons are owned by SOTs anyway.  Think you meant $200 tax stamp though. 76.24.147.114 (talk) 01:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I work for a firearms distributor, but took it under the GSSF program. 76.24.147.114 (talk) 15:44, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Dan Inosanto
why do you guys keep removing the info about ray parra and greg nelson form the dan inosanto page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.133.214.11 (talk) 21:09, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:14, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Phil H. Bucklew
You going to do anything with this anytime soon?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:51, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:01, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Review solicitation :-)
Once upon a time, you enjoyed the Ring-tailed Lemur article I wrote and submitted to FAC. I have another short lemur article up there now: Babakotia

If you don't have time, don't worry about it. I was just wanting to get 3 reviews out of the way before Friday. Weekends start getting a little busy for me due to work. Anyway, best wishes, –  VisionHolder  « talk »  01:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Colt Lightning
Mike, great job, excellent article. Yours, -- hmaag (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Smedley Butler
I think I am done making all the changes but please let me know if I missed anything. --Kumioko (talk) 05:05, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to say thanks for the help on the article. --Kumioko (talk) 18:25, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Bwwaaaaa ...
My delicate ears are ringing! Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 02:38, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Catholic_Church
I have proposed that the current GAR is closed and that EyeSerene and I open a new GAR. Would you have any objection to the proposal?  SilkTork  *YES! 17:06, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Donner
Hi, Mike. Can you find some information about the state park? What year was it created? What was the history of the area from 1847 to its creation, if anything? Does it include the Alder Creek site? What is on display, if anything? George Stewart alludes to a museum that was being contemplated in 1960, but I don't know if that came to fruition. Is there a statement from the State of California about the importance of the site, perhaps written in the state park mission statement or something similar? Is it primarily used for recreation today? Is there a state park and trail guide, perhaps written by a private writer to state what the general view of the site is today? Thanks. --Moni3 (talk) 17:28, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Moni, if Mike can't get that, User:Mav is Mr. State Parks :) Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 17:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll go today, although there's snow on I-80 and a lot more coming. I'll get something to eat later!--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 17:31, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Couch potatoes don't need food! Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 17:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah that's me!--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 17:37, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I appreciate what you can do, Mike. --Moni3 (talk) 17:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, one more request: the statue, pictured here, as I recall, is on a 22-ft pedestal to signify how deep the snow was. That I'm pulling completely from memory, which I have come to question quite a bit. Can you check with a source to verify that the pedestal is actually 22 feet tall, and it was designed to represent how deep the snow was that winter? Thanks. --Moni3 (talk) 18:23, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Catholic Church
You commented on the recent sweeping changes to the article. My critique of them and an alternate suggestion is linked at Talk:Catholic_Church  Xan  dar   14:03, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:07, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Suggestion
You might what to research and consider your edit summaries more carefully. for one. There may be apologists and minions out of Williamson out there, but I am not one of them as a careful review of the history of this article will show. I deleted the information sourced to the Catholic News Service because it duplicated other information in the article about the Argentinian government.. I still don't think the CNS is the best source in the circumstances. Perhaps you want to look at your edit again.--Slp1 (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Tags
As I wrote in the talk page, I don't think any tags are necessary right now, in the middle of the RFC. Also, the tag you added is not controversial (thankfully), but it is inaccurate due to the fact that little "revamping" has been done on the article since the start of the RFC. I think it's best if we just remove any tags for now. I'm not going to remove yours, but I hope you would do it yourself. UBER ( talk ) 22:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

CC
Responded on my page. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 20:55, 6 April 2010 (UTC)


 * You're very adamant today! Still, I usually write about literature, where I have to present what critics think. Since one doesn't know why a given author wrote what they've written, I consider it mostly guesswork and simply hang assertions around the necks of the relevant authorities, scholars, and critics. That's a lesson in writing that will help the CC article move forward (though honestly, I am having doubts about getting anything done!) Truthkeeper88 (talk) 23:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:15, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Winchester 1897
Hey Mike, thanks for the help. It means a lot. I was having trouble finding reliable sources. I am new to this whole wikipedia thing and I have been having trouble with properly citing things. Thanks again for your help.

Blade Steel article
Soon I'm going to start a draft on the article we were discussing. User talk:Halofanatic333/Blade Steel draft Check here to see the draft, and any extra info can go on the talk page.Halofanatic333 (talk) 11:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Mike, 1) Cobalt and Titanium are never used in knives in their pure form, e.g. Talonite and Stellite both contain 30%+ Cr, ~4% W and so on, i.e. they are alloys. Therefore, removing the word alloys was incorrect, I'm going to restore original wording. 2) The large portion you removed, I'm referring to steel terminology, it was cited with authors full consent, hardly qualifies as plagiarism. Assuming it's not on the knife forums, but on the knife dedicated website, would you object to the same content? 3) Tool steels fall under several categories, low alloyed, high alloyed, carbon, stainless, etc. It's not desirable to list it as its own category in the beginning. ZviJ (talk)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:45, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you for your quick efforts in getting the Charles P. Cecil article created. &mdash; MrDolomite &bull; Talk 18:43, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:26, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 17:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Notice
Hi. Your input on the length of the Catholic Church article would be welcome at Talk:Catholic Church. —  Jeff G. ツ  21:35, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:42, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Datejust
Ah, much better. Thanks for the cleanup. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 01:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

.50 caliber handgun
Thanks man. Oblivion Lost (talk) 17:58, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies  talk 19:23, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Caribbean Iguana
Hello Mr. Searson,

I recently posted an image on the page Green Iguana. I was wondering if this image accurately displays the overall idea of the article. I'm nominating this image for a featured picture, and I was wondering if there is anything different you want me to do with this picture.



Caribbean Iguana Featured Picture Candidate

Thanks, AmericanXplorer13 (talk) 21:34, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Caribbean Iguana
Mr. Searson, Thank you for your quick reply. I would love your help on getting it featured! If you go to the Featured Picture Candidates, you'll see I've added two other edited photos of the same type of Iguana. Just let me know which one you like the best!

Thanks, AmericanXplorer13 (talk) 07:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:28, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:55, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richard Bustillo


The article Richard Bustillo has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 19:43, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Bustillo


A tag has been placed on Richard Bustillo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 19:43, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Richard Bustillo, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ''I was planning to remove the tag myself, but you already had. Just remember, that you should not remove CSD tags yourself. '' jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 20:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC) 

Jsfouche has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!