User talk:Mikeblas/Archives/2021/December

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Please could you refrain from pinging me in edit summaries? Thanks, Seemplez 17:49, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * In the spirit of collaboration, I ping people when I fix perceived problems with their edits. Sometimes, the necessary repair is ambiguous because their intent is unclear. Even if not, a mention in the edit summary actively gives them a chance to review my changes and double-check my work. Sorry, but I make lots of edits and will be unlikely to remember your personal preference. Meanwhile, I hope you've reviewed my fixes to your recent edits and agree with them -- or can give them further attention until they're to your liking. -- Mikeblas (talk) 18:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Performance problem (organizational development) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Performance problem (organizational development) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Performance problem (organizational development) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:力百 (alt of power~enwiki, π,  ν ) 17:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding Your use of rev-del. The thread is Request for administrator comment on out of scope use or abuse of rev-del. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyleshome (talk • contribs) 05:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , looks like this is alredy settled and I can't even comment on it. What is "rev-del"? -- Mikeblas (talk) 17:46, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Ahah, I see: since Reed's law was protected along with Reed's Law, and you didn't see any vandalism in the history of lower-case-law, you assumed I had inappropriately administratively deleted old revisions of that article without following whatever process is necessary. And, immediatley took the matter to the Admin's noticeboard. Do I have it right? -- Mikeblas (talk) 17:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Levan Songulashvili
Hello, my name is Giorgi, editor of Georgian Wikipedia. I wonder why did you put the Undisclosed Payment template on the article? The article is created on a prominent Georgian artist, the article is neutral and sources are included.--გიორგი ჩუბინიძე (talk) 12:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello! Are you sure it was me? I last edited the article in 2018, and the version I produced doesn't have Undisclosed paid. Looks to me like the template in question was by User:Jerome501. -- Mikeblas (talk) 17:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)