User talk:Mikecraig/Archive 4

Reference is by me
Reference should have my name Tony Senatore from The Angels Beyond Salvation Fan Site. I wrote it in 1978, updated it in 1980, 1990.

I can add new information about The Angels and Doc Neeson, which I have latest news on them —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tony Senatore (talk • contribs) 00:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC).


 * Reference is not your name, ALL "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable" and it needs to follow OFFICIAL WP POLICY (FOR THE MILLIONTH TIME!!) - READ Verifiability - ENOUGH! --Mikecraig 00:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Metropolitan Fire Brigade (Melbourne)
Care to be more the slightest bit specific about what needs to be cleaned up? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 149.144.189.66 (talk) 03:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC).


 * First, why is history on bottom when it should up top of article. Secondly, no references are cited or quote as per official Verifiability policy. Thirdly, the layout with images needs to be cleaned up as to make the article look neat and easy to read.  There is other things but not as major at this stage. --Mikecraig 03:22, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Have started making cleanup changes and improvements to article --Mikecraig 06:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Johnny O'Keefe
I came here to say thanks for the good work on the JOK article expansion and got caught up in reading the shenanigans you've been having with User:Tony Senatore. I've left him another warning. I'll try to keep an eye on things but if I miss something, please let me know. &mdash;Moondyne 06:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I am trying to make some improvements...don't want to make waves and love that people are passionate about making updates/edits to WP articles but only if it's for the good of all and following policy..etc - thanks for the comment. --Mikecraig 06:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

latest reply
you can confirmed it by watching youtube. The promos and the match were all mentioned about wrestlemania III. Thank you.Iron Scorp 12:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * What rubbish are you going on about? --Mikecraig 22:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Stefanovic Vandalism
Why do you keep claiming the changes I make to Stefanovic's page are vanadlism? They are all true and factual and I will continue to make these changes to improve Wikipedia's accuracy. YOU are committing vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.166.104.250 (talk) 03:35, 10 May 2007 (UTC).


 * You are being banned from WP so enjoy your final moments of vandalism --Mikecraig 03:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Do you love him?

You're being banned, so there! NARC!


 * Before you get banned from Wikipedia, you should learn something. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button [[Image:Button sig2.png]] located above the edit window.  This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --Mikecraig 03:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ed-Hyland-Kavalee.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ed-Hyland-Kavalee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


 * It can be deleted --Mikecraig 21:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:RonnieJohnsHalfHour.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:RonnieJohnsHalfHour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * It can be deleted --Mikecraig 03:13, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Mattnewton.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mattnewton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

The Shebang
can you please stop messaging me? You have not improved the page and I thought the page was fine, if you do not share my same opinion you can put the tag back up

Countdown
Countdown played a very important for the Angels. Rememmer ARIA charts wasn't around in 1970s, I should know, I was around at that time. ARIA chart come into effect, the director of ARIA stated in October 1999. My cousin knowns to people at ARIA.

The Australian Post, my information didn't come there ARIA, no Countdown, yes

You might not have been around that time I was.


 * If you are going to start being silly again, be warned. Firstly putting a link to a wikipedia article that does not mention anything "citeable" or "notable" for a reference is incorrect.  Secondly the way I HAVE put reference is the CORRECT way and you have been warned about this previously by others. --Mikecraig 05:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * ONCE AGAIN LEARN THE FOLLOWING -> When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button [[Image:Button sig2.png]] located above the edit window.  This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when.    ALSO I am sure that Countdown was important to The Angels career but there is no "specific reference" that you quote linked to a part of the article to backup a statement. --Mikecraig 05:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Idiot posting by IP loser
Hulk Hogan was called Hollywood "Scum" Hogan by DDP in 1998 so you're wrong and there was no need for a warning.


 * Hey clownshoes...I think you will find that this was not a official ring or billed name for the subject in question...so shut yer yap!...nuff said--Mikecraig 01:53, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Doc Neeson is 100% correct
Everytging Doc Neeson bio is correct

You deleted Countdown tour its on ABC tv everyday, don't you watch tv

I have Doc Neeson bio from manager, you silly billy

Mike you nothing about the Angels


 * Stop wasting everyones time...S T A R T L E A R N I N G! --Mikecraig 03:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Tony
I know. Mike, I believe that Tony edits in good faith but his limited English and ignorance of basic Wikipedia policies has now become disruptive. I feel that I am too personally involved, so will get some advice from one or two other admins to see what can be done. In the meantime, please stay civil. Cheers. &mdash;Moondyne 03:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, appreciate your guidance. --Mikecraig 03:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

I am right
Born in Belfast from Irish parents, Bernard Neeson pent his youth following his father, soldier in the British Army, around the world. - i was right here

Finally, the family settles in Adelaide (Australia) where Bernard finished school. After spending time as conscript in the Australian army, - right again

Bernard went back to his studies in University and complete degrees in Film and English.

Doc Neeson came back in 2005, with a new band, Red Phoenix. In November 2005 they released a debut album, produced by former Angel’s producer Terry Manning. But later that month the band was forced to cancel all shows, again due to Doc's state of health. - right again


 * ONCE AGAIN LEARN THE FOLLOWING -> When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button [[Image:Button sig2.png]] located above the edit window.  This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --Mikecraig 06:11, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Hear hear
I don't suppose you actually think you were helping with that comment. I understand this is frustrating for you, but please try to avoid becoming part of the problem. Hesperian 00:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes I know. It didn't bother me. As far as I'm concerned, he can do what he wants on his talk page. I have reverted your revert. Hesperian 01:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No probs, he will undo himself again very soon with his antics I bet and will be blocked. --Mikecraig 01:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes. Did you think it warranted a response? Hesperian 05:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Just frustrating that he does not grasp a lot of the concepts of WP and then with those type of statements (slander) then that just makes it harder to point him the right direction so he can contribute effectively...my 5c worth. --Mikecraig 06:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I understand what you're saying. But Gnangarra is a big boy, and pretty thick-skinned too.
 * Look, he's blocked from editing. He can't update his Angels articles any more. He can't do anything much. The only thing he can do is participate in discussions at his talk page. Yet he is still hanging around. Why? Obviously he thinks the discussions on his talk page are worth hanging around for. Like most of us, he is addicted to the little orange "You have new messages" bar.
 * So if you really want him to leave, let his talk page as boring as possible. Ignore his silly and/or outrageous comments. Do not under any circumstances reward him with an orange bar. He'll soon leave, or die of boredom.
 * Hesperian 06:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Lol!...will do --Mikecraig 06:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Suggestion
Mike I've been watching whats occuring here with Tony, can I ask you to take a step back as it appears you've gotten so frustrated with it that every little thing has become a major problem, please let Hesperian and Moondyne help Tony with his editing. If there are any edits that Tony makes that are an issue just drop one of us a note and we'll do whats needed to fix, in the short term we live with poor grammar to get good information. As for citing lets assume good faith and see if it can or needs to be specifically verified before reverting. Gnangarra 05:23, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Not a problem, I will continue to contribute and edit the various articles I am interested in and follow WP guidelines and policies as per usual. That user in question will be sorted out by others as you suggest (good or bad). Thanks --Mikecraig 05:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Mike, I really think it'd be best if you leave Tony alone - consider taking his talk page off your watchlist. His editing is now blocked so there's nothing more that can be done.  As long as he's not abusive he's not hurting anyone while he posts to his own user page.  &mdash;Moondyne 06:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * No probs..one day he may learn. Thought those recent comments were close to slander against other users. --Mikecraig 06:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

ADF references
Hi Mike, If you'd take the time to compare the material in the 'notes' section (which is where the material in the inline citations ends up) and the 'references' section you'll see that all the publications cited in the text of the article are also referenced in the 'references' section. This is the approach recomended at Citing sources and is a common style of referencing essays and the like. The only things which aren't referenced twice at present are the press releases and individual parts of the Defence websites as it doesn't seem sensible to double-reference such sources which are focused on a single topic. As such, it definitely isn't the case that the sources listed in the 'references' section is in addition to what's included in the inline citations. --Nick Dowling 06:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Yep --Mikecraig 22:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject proposal
Hi Mike, there's a current proposal to start up a new WikiProject covering Australian music. See here. I thought you may be interested. Cheers &mdash;Moondyne 12:37, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Sounds like a good idea, will have a look --Mikecraig 22:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Buyfordollar.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Buyfordollar.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse@ 12:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Cenajared.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cenajared.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 19:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Help needed with agressive poster posting incorrect information.
Hi, Mike! I remembered how helpful you were to me before, so I am requesting your assistance. A user keeps editing Lukas Rossi's external links area with a fake MySpace site. I have posted to her TALK page a photograph that proves she is posting the wrong information, yet she comes on everyday and deletes my "undo" of her edit. The photograph is of Lukas Rossi himself with his myspace URL written on his hand (http://www.myspace.com/lukasrossitv). Lukas created the image because there was much confusion over which MySpace account was really his. This user who is completing edits is using a fake Lukas site and keeps deleting the real site. Is there anything that can be done to stop the constant hacks?

Monkeyhq 21:07, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Nevermind...someone fixed the issue! Thanks! Monkeyhq 21:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi there..How annoying was that for you...it's a shame that there is silly users like you mention do stuff to article just to show off or cause trouble!...hopefully they will learn.--Mikecraig 21:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Very annoying! But the problem seems to be fixed as the user has been locked.  Hopefully, she will just read her TALK page, or at least pay attention.  Thanks! Monkeyhq 22:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Cabcharge.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Cabcharge.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:50, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Fair use rational added to image --Mikecraig 23:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:CFAemblem.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:CFAemblem.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Have added rationale to image u dumb bot! --Mikecraig 22:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Michaelpa1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Michaelpa1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 09:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Ogalo do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Thewinchester (talk) 16:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Uh excuse me? Firstly where did the article go? Secondly what "external link" are you referencing? --Mikecraig 22:34, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, the Article was nominated CSD G11 as it clearly does not meet the relevant notability criteria, WP:CORP. It is written like an advertisement, has no information which meets notability (and sponsoring the football club of a private school does not confer notability by association either), lacks references, you get the idea. As it's been recreated, it will now be going for a Procedural AfD to deal with the matter. Thewinchester (talk) 23:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * As mentioned to Tone, You need to look at the hundreds of POV and biased articles that exist on WP for products, brands, companies...etc - this one is an Australian company and similar to other food outlets, restaurants (inc Oporto, Nandos..etc) - yes it does need expanding and ref's cited - I am in the process of cleaning this up to make it better. --Mikecraig 23:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Personal attack?
Re. I remind you of official policy regarding assuming good faith. Such comments are unhelpful. I suggest you lighten up a bit and provide reasoned arguments without adding unfounded speculation. &mdash;Moondyne 01:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * That's all good and fine, interesting note is that looking at various contributions and talk pages for the users in question they seems to be deleting articles left/right/centre without much discussion or justification. Like anything, they need not rush into or jump to any conclusions without facts or discussion --Mikecraig 01:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Just remember to stay civil. If you have concerns, raise them with the editors in a courteous and non-confrontational way and you'll more often than not get a positive outcome. &mdash;Moondyne 05:13, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Editing Richard Marsland
Remember good faith? The vandalism warning is unnecessary, and I'm sure you don't need me to cite Wikipedia policy now do you? Tag-molio 01:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * If you care to read any of the discussion regarding this article, that section and information was not part of the article and had been removed many times by various editors.--Mikecraig 01:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I did care to read the discussion on the article, and found your various editors to be about two people. So much authority it is blinding to look at. Also, it was agreed (actually, proposed by you) that "Armitage Shanks" should stay, and so I will proceed to return that nickname, at least. And once again, vandalism warning? How quaint. Tag-molio 03:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It's actually more than two, but good to see that you are "getting your facts straight" and reading things correctly. The Armitage Shanks name you mention was taken off with no argument by myself. So keep up your good work! --Mikecraig 03:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * "About two" implies not exactly two, but good to see you aren't "getting your facts straight" and misreading comments to justify you banality. A good day to you, sir Tag-molio 05:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Richmarsland.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Richmarsland.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 01:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Added disputed claim --Mikecraig 01:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bob franklin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bob franklin.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 01:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Added disputed claim on image page --Mikecraig 01:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Network Ten
A very simple answer, Category:Media companies of Australia is a sub-category of Category:Companies of Australia. It doesn't need to be in both, as one gives it the correct link to the master category. And as per the big green note at the top of the Aussie Companies category "...should list very few (if any) article pages directly, and should mainly contain sub-categories. Articles in this category should be moved to subcategories where appropriate.". Thewinchester (talk) 01:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Cool --Mikecraig 01:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Indiscriminate lists of information
If I find them in my travels, I'll take each of them on their merits accordingly and decide if any actions is warranted. If you have a list of such articles, I would kindly suggest reviewing that list yourself and doing the same. Thewinchester (talk) 02:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't have time to do that as busy with normal adding, editing and improvement tasks to WP but thought it may have interested you. No probs. --Mikecraig 02:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Edkavaleesmall.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Edkavaleesmall.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 04:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Added disputed claim on image page --Mikecraig 04:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Edcaftan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Edcaftan.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 04:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Remove image as it is no longer part of article - orphaned. --Mikecraig 04:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

No problem
--Closedmouth 04:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gregfleetpromo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gregfleetpromo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 10:13, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Added dispute claim on image talk page --Mikecraig 22:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Standupcam.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Standupcam.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 10:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Added dispute claim on image talk page --Mikecraig 22:18, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Andrew Farriss
Hi there, you've tagged the Andrew Farriss page for a clean up. Could you tell me what you think is wrong and I'll try and sort it out. Many thanks INXS-Girl 11:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


 * No dramas, have replyed to your talk page. --Mikecraig 22:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi again, I didn't write the page but look in now and again to make sure it's OK. Will try and work on it when I have some time, but maybe you'd do a better job than me. Thanks INXS-Girl 10:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Block
There's no question in my mind that it was Tony. &mdash;Moondyne 03:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah yep that makes it pretty clear. I will take off the tag to The Angels article, but if by chance there is any legit copyedit issues then I guess it will need to be looked at. --Mikecraig 03:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I reckon its sour grapes over being blocked. One of his tags referred to a sentence beginning "In 1975 On the recommendation of Bon Scott and Malcolm and Angus Young...". Tony himself wrote that on 2 October 2005 and since then there's been literally dozens of edits (mainly by him) tweaking the prose, so I would not get too worried. The whole article does need a thorough copyedit for grammar though. &mdash;Moondyne 04:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

The way I read his rant is that he believes there is a need for "permissions" if we reproduce facts that are published elsewhere. That of course is nonsense. We only need permission to reproduce copyright text - which I don't believe we are as all of the text that I have read appears to be either an editors own words or very reworked. At this stage, it'd be best to ignore him. &mdash;Moondyne 06:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No probs! --Mikecraig 06:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Australian music
Mike, I started up a new project page which you may be interested in but it needs lots of input. You're welcome to come on over and join up. Regards. &mdash;Moondyne 18:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Cool thanks --Mikecraig 22:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

D-Generation X
We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as D-Generation X, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Burntsauce 20:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yawn...read your talk page for comments --Mikecraig 21:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Scaredweirdg.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Scaredweirdg.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for that fair use rationale. ~ Trisreed my talk my contribs 09:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No probs..which image was it for? --Mikecraig 22:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

RE: Thanks
If Firefox did not have spell check I am sure a lot of people would have to fix my spelling too ;) - Mike Beckham 01:56, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Deleting Get This co-hosts
Mike, I'm surprised that you're supporting the deletion of the article that lists the co-hosts on Get This, considering you're a regular, reliable and dedicated contributer to this article. --Ninevah 05:46, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It is a bit odd...I guess I was sick and tired of trying to defend things against users who delete articles, images..etc with very little notice or justification. I know a lot of "list" articles get slammed on WP due to its "notability" worthyness. Am thinking of how the article may be better setout or used...what do you think? --Mikecraig 05:53, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Personally, I think there are many more articles more deserving of deletion than this one. Hell, I'd rather the Get This Trivia page was deleted instead. The co-host page is what it is. It doesn't pretend to be anything other than that. Why about other deletion-worthy articles such as Storylines of Neighbours.--Ninevah 06:19, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD for List of most popular social networking platforms by country
Hi, thanks for the message. Have looked at the AfD and it seems that you missed a few steps when listing the AfD. I have since corrected the issues, and if you ever want to nominate something for AfD again - take a read through this page as it covers the process you need to follow in full. You can make it even easier by configuring twinkle within your Wikipedia profile, but that's for another time. As you AfD nom didn't have a deletion argument in there I have taken the liberty of adding one in which I think covers most of the issues relating to the article in question. If you've got any further questions or need assistance, please don't hesitate to get in touch via my talk page. Cheers, Thewinchester (talk) 03:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You left me that message just as I was finishing off a note on your talk page. Timing is everything. Thewinchester (talk) 03:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * lol for sure!...will look at the links you mention above. Thanks --Mikecraig 03:40, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Richard Marsland
Hey, Mike! I was looking through the history at Richard Marsland. There is an ongoing discussion at the Help Desk and you might want to join in. Thanks.  Cool Blue talk to me 11:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

M*A*S*H Wikiproject
Hi, thank you for supporting the M*A*S*H Wikiproject proposal I started, I was wondering, I'm also asking the other user that also put their name, but I was just wondering if, even if the project doesn't happen, if together, you would still like to help me organize M*A*S*H articles? If so, please message me back on my talk page. Thank you JpGrB 17:30, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Lisa Robertson
No big deal. No easy way to tell unless you stumbled upon Lisa Robertson (Fired Flight Attendant) and its history. (John User:Jwy talk) 01:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Tony
Most certainly yes, but the best strategy would be to ignore. &mdash;Moondyne 07:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Caftan2 big.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Caftan2 big.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:02, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Added fair use rationale --Mikecraig 22:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Category
Yeah, it seemed a bit odd it wasn't created previously. Feel free to populate as I am going offline for a while now. &mdash;Moondyne 06:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Liberation
Its currently set to 4 columns if you are using Mozilla (Firefox). With IE you'll see only one. If you wish to change it, I'm not in the slightest fussed either way. Cheers. &mdash;Moondyne 05:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No dramas, I will leave it. Was not aware of the difference between the browers for that (but thanks for letting me know so I can keep that in mind). --Mikecraig 06:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, its a bugger that IE hasn't yet implemented the columns feature.  That's one of the reasons I prefer Firefox.  &mdash;Moondyne 06:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ogalo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ogalo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Remove image Mr Bot! --Mikecraig 03:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Richmarsland.JPG
This photograph is of a living person and is a copyrighted image. An image of a Marsland could be created under a free license, simply by somebody taking a picture of him, or even asking permission from the source of the image to release the image under a free license so it can be used at Wikipedia. Non-free content should only be used when it is irreplaceable, which is not the case for this scenario.

Only two exceptions have been offered to my knowledge where a claim of fair use applies to a photograph of a living person, those being J.D. Salinger and Osama bin Laden, both living a reclusive lifestyle. The deletion log for this image shows I'm not the only editor who thinks your rationale was invalid. I hope this helps explain my edits concerning this image. -- Longhair\talk 06:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Passionahighposter.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Passionahighposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Email
&mdash;Moondyne 07:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Passhigh.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Passhigh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete it - not required--Mikecraig 10:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Fifibox.jpg
I have tagged Image:Fifibox.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast 16:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Fifibox.jpg
I have tagged Image:Fifibox.jpg as replaceable fair use. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast 16:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Seeing if I have any free use images of subject in question. --Mikecraig 22:21, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Talkingboony.jpg may be incorrectly licenced
An anonymous poster editing from has indicated this image, uploaded by yourself, has been incorrectly licenced, and may therefore not be available in the public domain as indicated. The image appears to be the exact same image as appears on the Flickr website at http://www.flickr.com/photos/themalones/87372546/, which is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 licence.

I've tagged the image as having a wrong licence for now and moved the comments from the anonymous contributor to the image's talk page. I'd appreciate if you could stop by this image description page to clear up any misunderstandings there thanks. -- Longhair\talk 03:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Loverock.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Loverock.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Longhair\talk 03:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:DickTufeld.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:DickTufeld.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 04:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Steambbqporkbun.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Steambbqporkbun.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Longhair\talk 04:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Better source request for Image:Thecagebris.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Thecagebris.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Longhair\talk 04:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Getthiscdcover.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Getthiscdcover.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 04:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Peteberner.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Peteberner.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 04:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bb2007cast.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Bb2007cast.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Longhair\talk 04:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:TheClubDVD.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TheClubDVD.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 04:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Have added fair use rationale and info --Mikecraig 04:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Georgegaynespic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Georgegaynespic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 04:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Better source request for Image:Calwilsonpublicity.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Calwilsonpublicity.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Longhair\talk 04:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Gbandmembers.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gbandmembers.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 04:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Added fair use rationale --Mikecraig 04:46, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kellieconnollynews.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kellieconnollynews.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 04:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Added --Mikecraig 05:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Slicegbread.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Slicegbread.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Longhair\talk 04:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Edkavaleesmall.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Edkavaleesmall.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 04:42, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Remove image as orphaned now --Mikecraig 04:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Better source request for Image:FlanaganKitty.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FlanaganKitty.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Longhair\talk 04:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Halting the image alerts
No problems. I either address them or remove them from my own talk page when I receive them myself. It's better to avoid them in the first place though. Please be sure when uploading images to Wikipedia that you a) include the correct licence, and b), adequately describe the source where you obtained them from.

We all make mistakes, I've done the same thing myself when I was new around here. Knowledge of copyright isn't everyone's forte, so you're not alone. Perhaps check over your own image contributions and correct any information you think might be incomplete or misleading. That'll at least put a stop to receiving any image alerts at all. If you need any help with licencing, feel free to ask. I'll be of some help where I can. -- Longhair\talk 04:56, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, will get these cleaned up or ask to remove them off WP --Mikecraig 05:01, 29 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I can delete any images you wish removed, as I've just done for Image:Edkavaleesmall.jpg. I'll check back on your comments later and remove any images that you feel aren't acceptable. -- Longhair\talk 05:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Peterfosterfiji.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Peterfosterfiji.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Georgegaynespic.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Georgegaynespic.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Also true of Image:Getthiscdcover.gif. Please make sure that you've added a detailed fair-use rationale to any image you've uploaded that is not licensed under a free license, as non-free images without detailed rationales are deleted. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Added fair use rationale to Image:Getthiscdcover.gif. --Mikecraig 22:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

A bit quiet lately?
Is it too soon to say that your mate has left us for good? &mdash;Moondyne 04:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Heh, if you are referring to TS then it seems so. I like his passion but he just needs to do the right thing and then he can contribute effectively.--Mikecraig 22:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Crowded House
-- linca linca  06:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the invite, have put my name down. --Mikecraig 11:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Ogalo
Thanks. It's exactly the same content when it was added 10 days ago, and was speedy deleted as recreation of previously deleted material. If it happens again, it will be going back to AfD for a salting. Cheers, Thewinchester (talk) 23:06, 16 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Ahh okay, no probs...will keep an eye out for this. --Mikecraig 04:24, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * It's actually happened again already, but was csd'ed as recreation again. A number of users have this page on watch, and lightfoot was been appropriately warned this and actions including comments made on his talk page and others (version before he page blanked), particularly where he referred to some users (myself included) as a cumstain on the bedsheet that is wikipedia (diff). I found this very amusing, particularly from a single purpose editor who recreated articles deleted at AfD without going to WP:DRV. Thewinchester (talk) 14:57, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * What a pain eh! Thanks for the info. --Mikecraig 22:18, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * we know exactly what you meant Sammy. Please stop trolling people's talk pages. Thewinchester (talk) 13:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't mind discussion on my talk page, if any issues then let me know. Thanks --Mikecraig 22:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Getthis.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Getthis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed as there was vandalism to article it was linked to, and also added fair use rationale --Mikecraig 22:57, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Tonycrop.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tonycrop.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Corrected tag and added rationale --Mikecraig 22:12, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Gbandmembers.jpg
I have tagged Image:Gbandmembers.jpg as replaceable fair use. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast 16:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Billgrangernz.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Billgrangernz.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 12:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Added fair use rationale --Mikecraig 22:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Billgrangernz.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Billgrangernz.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 07:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes
Yes, he is at it again. He created a sock puppet a/c last night which was blocked within minutes. Thewinchester (talk) 02:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Ahh okay, thanks for letting me know. --Mikecraig 11:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Robot Karl
hi, you say something along the lines of why are people wasting their time vandalizing Karl Stefanovic's page, why are you wasting your time Changing it back, when you know its going to go back up? lol. Its funny what some people come up with. Not annoying. D.R.

WikiProject Crowded House
Hi! A discussion has begun at WikiProject Crowded House's talk page regarding the future and goals of the WikiProject. Please feel free to contribute to this discussion in any way you see as being positive. -- linca linca  10:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, will have a look --Mikecraig 22:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Talkingboony.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Talkingboony.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Torchwood press release
Dear ,

Just because it's on a fan site it dosn't mean the press release isn't official or doesn't exist! I know of two places the two-line release is quoted: the SFSA site and my personal pages. It is performing an important function, that of preventing people continually editing the Torchwood page to claim the Big brother finale over run lead to the schedule change. If you'd rather see the link go to a Yahoo personal site, fine. MartinSFSA 03:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * That's five days, I'm reinstating it with the link to my site. MartinSFSA 08:25, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:AahLGeelong.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AahLGeelong.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 08:01, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Tonycrop.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Tonycrop.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 20:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Kellieconnollynews.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kellieconnollynews.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 20:50, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Kellieconnollynews.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kellieconnollynews.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 20:50, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Richardwilkins.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Richardwilkins.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 20:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Landofgiants.gif
I have tagged Image:Landofgiants.gif as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast 20:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Brigpic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brigpic.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 01:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Better source request for Image:Thecage.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Thecage.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Longhair\talk 01:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Abmedal.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Abmedal.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Homehardwarelogo.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Homehardwarelogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair\talk 21:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:AQISlogo.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:AQISlogo.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 20:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Avma2007.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Avma2007.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 10:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Beerenberglogo.gif
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Beerenberglogo.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:53, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 15:53, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Beerenberglogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Beerenberglogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:09, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Love-boat.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Love-boat.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 16:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)