User talk:Mikedelph

February 2014
Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mike Delph because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 16:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mike Delph. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mike Delph was changed by Mikedelph (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929348 on 2014-02-17T18:15:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Actually, the Cluebot reversal was a false positive. I double checked the series of edits, and User:Mikedelph was merely correcting vandalism to his page, which falls under an allowed type of edit in the Wikipedia policy concerning a conflicts of interest (WP:COI). As a "human" editor, I fixed this fact/vandalism.Crtew (talk) 03:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)