User talk:Mikehenke

A tip on how to "sign" your Talk page comments
Hello, I've appreciated your thoughtful observations about phrasing, grammar, and punctuation on the article Rolfing. Don't get discouraged if some of your edits get reverted; keep floating out your ideas for how to make articles better. Just one suggestion, when you write a note on a Talk page, at the end, click the little button that has a picture of a pen writing some letters (it's above the box you are writing in, usually the fourth file from the left). This will automatically add your name and the date. Or you can type four ~ in a row. Sincerely, --Karinpower (talk) 04:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

About WP:NPOV
On my old user page you wrote: "It seems to have a anti bias and not neutral." You fail to understand our NPOV policy. It does not refer to article neutrality, but to editorial neutrality. Editors must remain neutral in their presentation of what is found in reliable sources.

Content in an article must reflect the biases found in the reliable sources it uses. We don't whitewash articles of anything non-neutral or neuter them. We don't write favorable sales brochures. Some subjects are generally viewed by mainstream sources as fringe or other negative things. The article will reflect that bias. It will read more negative than positive, and that will naturally disturb those who view the subject positively.

The only way to change that is to get the subject to become legitimate so the prevailing views in reliable sources are positive about the subject. That can take decades AFTER the change has been made. Chiropractic has still not succeeded because the "profession" is half-hearted in fighting unscientific beliefs and unethical practices, all of which are discussed in numerous reliable sources.

I have written a lot about this in this essay: NPOV means neutral editors, not neutral content. -- BullRangifer (talk) 04:27, 11 January 2017 (UTC)