User talk:Mikejonezz

License tagging for Image:PLAY 151.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PLAY 151.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 20:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Buckfast
Please indicate the sources of your edits - read WP:ATT. Happy editing!  Dei z  talk 17:54, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I grew up in Portadown in Northern Ireland where Buckfast is one of the most popular drinks among young people and there Buckfast was nicknamed Monkey's Blood. I've never heard it called 'Commotion Lotion' and Stella is always 'Beat the wife' so will you please stop changing my edits because as far as nicknames go for Buckfast, we're both correct.
 * Read WP:ATT. If you disregard policy like this again, you'll be blocked for disruption. Perceived truth is not important, verification is.  Dei z  talk 17:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

So you can only add stuff that is correct if the BBC has reported on it? It's hardly a disruption if I'm informing people of what it's called in another province, surely?
 * You may only add material that can be reliably sourced, and the onus is on the editor adding the information to provide this verification. This is especially important when dealing with minor references to local slang. You are, of course, welcome to start your own Buckfast fan page on Myspace and call it whatever you like. The disruption would be for re-adding unverified information despite being aware that this is against policy.  Dei z  talk 02:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)