User talk:Mikekuang009



Hello, Mikekuang009, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode


 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 07:59, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi there
The way you're editing is not very constructive; go on like this, and you'll probably be blocked. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!  07:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Ping User:Materialscientist. Joshua Jonathan  - Let's talk!  09:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Oh okay. Thank you for the constructive feedback and warning. I'll be both more mindful and thoughtful about my editing. Are there principles that are suggested to follow when editing constructively? - uncle Mike Kuang Mikekuang009 (talk) 18:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

X-SAMPA
Hi. Could you explain your edits Special:Diff/1139175595/1143216598 at X-SAMPA? I undid them because they appear to be mostly nonsensical to me as I briefly summarised when undoing. Could you explain how is the previous version lacking and what were you trying to achieve with your edit?

You changed "the individual language SAMPA alphabets" to "the individual language(s) of SAMPA alphabets" which is backwards (the original phrasing means "the SAMPA alphabets of individual languages"). Additionally, spelling with "(s)" is virtually never correct in normal prose. You either mean language or languages, not both. Note also that usually only the singular form is correct when used attributively to modify other noun regardless of its grammatical number.

You changed "as a hack to work around (...)" to "as one of the hack ing methods to work around (...)". Please follow the link if you don't know what a hack is. The phrase "hacking method" suggests something completely different and it makes no sense in this context. Additionally, please make sure that you link whole words.

"Unicode support for IPA symbols was more commonly used and became more widespread"—what do you mean by support being used? The original sentence seems much clearer to me. "For what is considered true IPA"—considered by whom? "True" might not be the best word to use here, but IPA is well defined and it's not a matter of anyone's consideration.

Replacing "range of characters" with "range of letters and characters" and adding parenthetical definition of phonetics is less problematic, but still unnecessary. The term characters already includes letters and has advantage of not having to classify IPA symbols more precisely than needed. And to anyone who doesn't already know what phonetics is the whole article would be completely meaningless and they would have to follow the link to phonetics anyway, so it seems pointless to define it inline. – MwGamera (talk) 11:51, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Data scraping, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop Meters (talk) 21:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Samkhya. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 23:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Buddhi, you may be blocked from editing. CodeTalker (talk) 19:00, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Concern regarding Draft:MetaCognation
Hello, Mikekuang009. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MetaCognation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:MetaCognation


Hello, Mikekuang009. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MetaCognation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:57, 13 September 2023 (UTC)