User talk:Mikematt101

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushton2010 (talk) 14:58, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushton2010 (talk) 14:58, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

The problem we have is that the sources have to be verifiable. With the book not being freely available we are unable to do that, and with the book being written by a member of the family, we would judge the content to be potentially dubious.

I would recommend including some internet references in order to allow us to verify the information. -A quick google search has pulled up several pages you could use; including local and national history pages. Online birth/marriage/death/baptism records could be used to reference your dated facts.

We prefer you use inline references (after the full stop). You can do this by clicking the 'cite your sources' at the bottom of the editing page; it will include two " " things, and you put your reference or link in between them.

I've also found an error. You state the family purchased 'Ston Easton Minor' in 1544; the National Archives state they purchased the manor at 'Ston Easton' in 1544 and did not acquire 'Ston Easton Minor' until 1722-24..

If you want to contact me after you've added these references, I'd be happy to review it for you and save you having to wait for it to make it's way through the backlog (which is currently taking up to and over a month).

Rushton2010 (talk) 15:46, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Don't worry to much about the formatting of references, so long as the core link is there, we have an automated system that fills in the missing bits. All of yours are fantastic though- nothing needs adding or changing.

I'll put the article through the review process. As I say, saves it sitting in the backlog list for weeks. I can't see any obvious problems so it should be approved.

Rushton2010 (talk) 16:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 John Hippisley (1530-1570), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Rushton2010 (talk) 17:04, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.