User talk:Mikequfv

Welcome!
Hello, Mikequfv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Shenzhen has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 03:14, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Whittier, Alaska, you may be blocked from editing. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:28, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:31, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I apologize, I suddenly realized I was completely misinterpreting what you were doing and it was not vandalism at all. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Green snow
I'm not bothered with the colour of the snow being green or blue. But take a look at precipitation where is says that it includes both rain and snow. So all three should be the same colour. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:44, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Air.light (talk) 04:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. Air.light (talk) 03:15, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Barrow, Alaska. LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 18:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Moscow, Idaho. Mike1901 (talk) 17:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Katietalk 00:40, 19 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I blocked you because you've been warned about making these changes unilaterally. You refuse to discuss them with other editors and you leave no option but to block you to stop your disruption. When your block expires, start getting consensus for your edits or you may be blocked again. Katietalk 00:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Air.light (talk) 22:00, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for evading your block by continuing your disruptive editing anonymously. Your current 48-hour block has been changed to be indefinite.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ‑Scottywong | express _ 00:03, 20 May 2016 (UTC) When will I be unlocked? It's been at least a week now. How long did you plan to block me?
 * You put the unblock request inside of the block request, so the code might not've raised an admin correctly. However, based on WP:VALIDALT, you will probably be unlikely to get an unblock on this account because there is no way to prove that your son no longer has access to your account (See WP:PASSWORD).  Your best bet is to stop any IP editing you (or your son) has been doing immediately (editing while not logged in can be counted as sockpuppet activity, especially when you've been blocked), and talk to the admins that are discussing your case [|here].  They may or may not allow you to create a new account to make sure your son is not able to make bad edits in your name. 170.178.234.233 (talk) 17:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Air.light (talk) 19:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 01:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)