User talk:MikesWarren

March 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Joseph Watson, you may be blocked from editing. Do not intentionally mislead users with your edit summaries, as you did at Paul Joseph Watson.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  23:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Paul Joseph Watson. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.''You should try to reach consensus on the article's talk page before reverting to your preferred version. Just using canned edit summaries isn't a good enough justification.'' Everymorning (talk) 01:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.