User talk:Mikes Robins

Help
Can somebody help me create a new article Mikes Robins (talk) 19:48, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Mikes. If you go to Article wizard you'll be presented with some steps you can follow to create a new article. --Neil N  talk to me 20:09, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

But I have wrote an article before then be deleted by someone and I don't know why? I have wrote a draft, can you help me modify it and make sure it will not delete after submit?Mikes Robins (talk) 20:30, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Because it reads like an advertisement. Have a look at Drive Vaccine for a better example. --Neil N  talk to me 21:46, 4 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I have deleted the "article" again. Wikipedia is not free ad space and should not be used as such. See WP:SPAM. Huon (talk) 21:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Your recent edit to List of data recovery software appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 16:01, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aid file recovery software


A tag has been placed on Aid file recovery software, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Neil N  talk to me 21:38, 4 October 2014 (UTC) I am very disappoint about wiki editors who are the Self - righteous high-level editing. I have wrote something just introduce something,you thought I did the advertisement. However,there are many many many many same kinds artics which are introduce somethings like what I wrote. Why these many things are not judged as spams by you guys? It seems you are very bureaucracy, there is no justice in the heart of you. Mikes Robins (talk) 18:22, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * You chose to ignore the stark warning message (still in the deleted text) of . That's usually what happens if any newcomer tries to create an article direct - you do not know enough policies to be able to make a successful page. If you want me to restore it to a Draft article then let me know. <b style="border:1px solid #dfdfdf;color:green; padding:1px 3px;background:#FFD">Ron h jones </b>(Talk) 18:56, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I see you already have a draft article going. <b style="border:1px solid #dfdfdf;color:green; padding:1px 3px;background:#FFD">Ron h jones </b>(Talk) 18:58, 6 October 2014 (UTC)


 * We're constantly trying to reduce the amount of spam on Wikipedia. Some promotional articles may have slipped through the cracks, but that's no excuse for you to write one, too. The article I deleted cited no independent sources and instead called the software "powful" [sic] and talked of how good it was at its role. The draft actually is in better shape and cites some third-party coverage, though the how-to guide should still be removed and the sources used as the basis of the draft - cited for the good and the bad they have to say, not just for the conclusion. Huon (talk) 19:35, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aidfile recovery


A tag has been placed on Aidfile recovery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 11:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Aid file recovery software


A tag has been placed on Draft:Aid file recovery software requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/Back-Up-and-Recovery/Aidfile-recovery-software-professional.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. demize (t · c) 14:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)