User talk:Miketoddnet

Welcome!
Hello, Miketoddnet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=570533197 your edit] to David Dippie Dixon may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:11, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 *  David Dippie Dixon' Whittingham, 1 September 1842-Rothbury, 28 November 1929 was an English local historian

David Dippie Dixon
Don't blindly revert an edit while leaving no edit summary. You must leave an edit summary for all your edits. If you don't know why an edit was made, ask the person and not blindly revert. Bgwhite (talk) 19:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Your blanking of the David Dippie Dixon article
I noticed that you blanked the David Dippie Dixon article due to an error from a bot. Blanking the article was not the proper thing to do here - you should leave it up and correct the things that are wrong. You could also add an "under construction" tag to the article if you plan on rewriting it. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:21, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

I am normally meticulous with references/citations, and false attributions are as bad as incorrect facts. I'm not sure how I can avoid a bot sticking references outside bracketed facts where the reference only covers part of the facts, so I've now removed all the references that I had inserted and will try to re-work them.