User talk:Mikey242

 Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

— Natha  n  ( talk ) 02:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Eco-footprint
Thank-you for attempting to deal with the vandalism issues on this page. There were a few references etc. that were still astray so I reverted to an earlier version (twice - I hadn't noticed another vandal at work!). In cases of complex vandalism you might find this easier than attempting to revert the individual edits. Apologies if I have inadvertantly deleted any additional comments you might have wanted to add but at a quick glance I couldn't see any. Ben MacDui (Talk) 11:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Eco-footprint
Thanks for reverting to an earlier version, I wanted to fix the references but was unable to due to time restrictions. I didn't add any additional information so not to worry. Thanks again. 12:12, 10 December 2006

Myxine
The tassobox does not reflect a cladistic analysis, but rather a traditional scheme of classification. Chordata are to be divided, traditionally, in Urochordata, Cephalochordoata, Vertebrata (sensu Craniota, which means "true" vertebrates, i.e. animals with vertebrae + myxiniformes, which have none). The whole article is full of contradictions, and many articles about the classification of the basal Craniota are a complete mess. I tried to explain the complex situation in the page talk, but I was ignored. I think we need a project to discuss the topic and fix the most striking inconsistencies. But I'm a botanist, not a zoologist, whatsoever. If you need help, just write on my talk page Aelwyn 16:34, 5 May 2007 (UTC)