User talk:Mikey3778

November 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Matteo Renzi. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 02:48, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wesley Clark, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Laser brain  (talk)  18:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 05:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Mikey3778 (talk) 22:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

, you blocked for abusing multiple accounts. This user is operating on the same IP address. Should the autoblock be lifted or should this account be blocked? --Yamla (talk) 23:16, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, just a comment: I swear I have nothing to do with RadarHV (I'm on public WiFi with lots of clients), and even though I'm kinda new at this I have been making constructive edits on Wikipedia. Thanks! Mikey3778 (talk) 23:20, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

This account, RadarHV1373272,, and are ✅. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 02:52, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

What's THAT supposed to mean? I already told you that I'm on public WiFi. Do you have a problem with the fact that I don't have that much money? Mikey3778 (talk) 03:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Mikey3778 (talk) 05:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

or any other CheckUser: DoRD tells us that Mikey3778 is technically indistinguishable from Ip12913018193. If those two accounts are the same person, then Mikey3778 should be blocked, and if not then the autoblock should be removed. Is it possible for DoRD or another CheckUser to make an assessment as to whether the technical data could reasonably be simply due to separate editors using the same public Wifi? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:08, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * My understanding of "technically indistinguishable" is that this is much more than just using the same IP address. While I don't have checkuser rights, I can imagine the specific additional data involved (I'm a web developer). I'd like a comment from a checkuser, but I strongly imagine that means we should block this account as a confirmed sockpuppet. --Yamla (talk) 11:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * was blocked for vandalism, and apparently, while reviewing that unblock request, Jpgordon blocked . When I looked at the Harvard account's fourth unblock request, I found and blocked Mikey3778 and Ip12913018193. The four accounts are technically indistinguishable, i.e. they are using the same device on the same IP address. Please also note the unblock request on User talk:Harvard1373271, where it is claimed that the IP address is a shared address in an apartment building as opposed to public WiFI. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)