User talk:Mikeylito/Archive 2012

Live in the truth.

UserBoxes
Hi Mikey. I've no idea how to edit "User:Mikeylito/User Infobox" so that it doesn't add the 0-level usercats, per UCfD. If you could edit it, it'd be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Xiner (talk, email) 21:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

User Category for Discussion
 A category created by you or to which you have significantly contributed is being considered for deletion, rename, move or merge in accordance with Wikipedia's Categories for Discussion policies. This does not mean that any of the userpages in the category will be deleted. They may, however, be recategorized. Please share your thoughts on the matter at this category's entry on the User categories for discussion page. VegaDark (talk) 07:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

My edit of User:Mikeylito/User Infobox
Hello Mikeylito...I edited your infobox page and made it a transclusion instead of a direct copy so that it will be continually updated from the source. I make changes and add things to it all the time. If something appears to be broken on it when you return, please let me know on the infobox's talk page. There will be a major renovation soon. Hopefully everyone currently using this box will like it. - LA @ 14:15, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Pintley
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pintley, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.pintley.com/about.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pintley
A tag has been placed on Pintley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Chzz  ► 18:59, 26 September 2010 (UTC)


 * In addition, it is "Unambiguous advertising or promotion" (G11|G11)  Chzz  ► 19:00, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Long Beach City Place


The article Long Beach City Place has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources - see WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Chzz  ► 19:02, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walton High School (New York City), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Jackson High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:12, 4 October 2012 (UTC)