User talk:Miks2012

Welcome!
Hello, Miks2012, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as PascalABC.NET, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kwpolska (spam me/contributions) 12:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes - you are right - this article hasn't been updated in such a long time. But now some improvments were made by independent authors not affiliated with the PascalABC.NET project. Please  - is that enough? I see references to some educational publications with good reliable content, some references to a well known Delphi Book with mention of functional features of a PascalABC.NET language and also the references to research-related articles concerning static code analysis of PascalABC.NET project. Is this enough? Can I remove the proposed deletion tag? With respect, Miks2012 (talk) 18:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Miks2012
 * You may remove the "proposed deletion" tag if you disagree with it - this process is meant for uncontroversial deletions, and if there are objections, the procedure is to remove the tag. However, this article is still of very low quality, was written largely by people with a conflict of interest and, in my opinion, is not notable enough to be in Wikipedia, so if the proposed deletion is objected to, please be aware that I will nominate it for deletion via the AfD process. Kwpolska (spam me/contributions) 19:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes - this is a problem - the article was originally written by affiliated authors. But we no longer write, since we realized that. Unfortunately, these edits cannot be removed. This creates a vicious circle problem: to improve the article, we or anybody need to remove the affiliate authors who wrote here, but it is not possible. Miks2012 (talk) 20:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of PascalABC.NET


The article PascalABC.NET has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No citations (with 'more citations needed' template added in April 2016), does not seem to be notable (most hits on the first 5 pages of Google are auto-generated or self-created, only 10 StackOverflow questions), conflict of interest (article created and edited primarily by two of the software’s authors)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.