User talk:Mil8

Disconcerting
With all the content, and all the millions of users, it's depressing how much time is spent weighing deletion of valid content. Also, I find the constant review of what's "encyclopedic" takes away news that might be viewed in retrospect as a critical event, while keeping meaningless tripe on Entertainment and celebrity issues! Note bono: lack of ties between current paleontology discoveries and "historical" info. I think Wiki "managers" are keeping Wikipedia "current" with the *20th* century! 71.136.160.3 17:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Dogballs
Welcome to Wikipedia. We're delighted to have you. The article you created was tagged to be discussed for deletion. This is because it does not appear to meet the Avoid neologisms guideline. I note that you removed this tag. If you would like to have time to improve the article, please indicate this on the article's talk page. Please see Your first article for help. If the article is not improved, citing sources, it will have to be nominated for deletion in accordance with the Deletion policy. Thank you for your contributions and again, welcome. Accurizer 04:21, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Golf
Hi I thought that a way to further improve the golf articles on Wikipedia is for the whole project to work together towards a goal. An example of this could be a certain number of good articles in so many months, or to create the project's first ever featured article. If you are interested, come to the talk page and discuss it. And hopefully through this the project can continue to work towards several goals in the near future. Grover 10:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)