User talk:Milad

In response to your feedback
Consider visiting Tutorial.

SwisterTwister  talk  20:12, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

response to question
Hi Milad77. I replied to your question at my Talk page, and will respond further there if you have more questions. My first answer probably does not suffice, but I am willing to try to help more. -- do ncr  am  20:38, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Please don't edit war
Hi, I noticed that you have been repeatedly adding the link to the blog at Baha'i Faith. I also noticed you have not given a reason that the link should be included. When you have a disagreement like this, the right thing to do is to start a new section on the article talk page to try to resolve the dispute. If you continue to edit war, you will probably be blocked from editing altogether. ~Adjwilley (talk) 20:35, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, if you have any questions or concerns, feel free to contact me on my talk page. ~Adjwilley (talk) 20:38, 14 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Further to this, and assuming your sincerity and good faith, the specific subject of the link concerned actually has its own article (this one) Political accusations against the Baha'i Faith. Is there perhaps an English language version of the blog? That could go nicely there, if only to demonstate that no one is setting up any "straw men" - and that the tales concerned are not just fishing for sympathy by the Baha'is (which does get said). -Soundofmusicals (talk) 00:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Another thing to consider, this site http://bahai-library.com/pdf/m/masumian_debunking_persian.pdf has been rejected as a reference on Wiki. Might make an instructive read, but that is not the point, nor is it why I am directing you to it. From Wikipedia's point of view both this, and the blog you want to insert are both highly partisan accounts of controversial matters, and while not without interest they do not belong in an encyclopedia. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 02:56, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

برو بینیم بابا.Milad77 (talk) 13:08, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

New huggle 3.1 is going to be released soon
Hi Milad, we are to release a new major version of huggle, but we did receive almost no feedback from our beta testing team, which you are a part of (see https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members). It would be of a great help if you could download it (if you have windows, all you need to do is getting http://tools.wmflabs.org/huggle/files/huggle3.1.0beta.exe and putting it to a folder where you have installed huggle) and test it. You can always get a help with making it @ !

Major changes:
 * Multisite support - you can now log in to unlimited number of wikis in 1 huggle session and get a huge queue of all edits made to these wikis. This is good for smaller projects which gets overlooked often.
 * Ranged diffs - you can select multiple revisions and get a huge diff that display all changes done to them.
 * Fixes of most of bug reports we had so far

In case you found a bug, please report it to bugzilla: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?product=Huggle&list_id=147663 thank you! Petrb (talk) 10:12, 30 July 2014 (UTC)