User talk:Milanbijoux

Possibly unfree File:Mona Lisa Brookshire.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mona Lisa Brookshire.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 00:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

pls dont delete (Milanbijoux (talk) 18:23, 25 February 2010 (UTC))

Speedy deletion nomination of Mona Lisa Brookshire


A tag has been placed on Mona Lisa Brookshire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Martin H. (talk) 05:01, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mona Lisa Brookshire
A tag has been placed on Mona Lisa Brookshire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 17:23, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Mona Lisa Brookshire, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 18:35, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Mona Lisa Brookshire
I have nominated Mona Lisa Brookshire, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Mona Lisa Brookshire. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fred the Oyster (talk) 19:14, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

In an Article for deletion it is accepted convention that one writes "keep" or "delete" only once, so as to avoid possibly giving the misleading impression that several different editors are involved. Even though the decision is not made on the basis of a vote, this is less confusing. I have therefore struck out all but one of your "keeps". JamesBWatson (talk) 20:09, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mona Lisa Brookshire, you will be blocked from editing. Fred the Oyster (talk) 22:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing; we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. Please stop; If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Fred the Oyster (talk) 22:22, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. - Rklawton (talk) 22:29, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Use of multiple accounts
I notice that at Articles for deletion/Mona Lisa Brookshire you refer to "all articles of every Ghanaian American that I have submitted to Wiki in the past few years". Since no other articles have been created by this account, which was only created on 19 November 2009, does this mean you have previously edited from one or more other accounts? If so, can you please give a list of such accounts? Thank you in advance.