User talk:MilanoLove

Vandalism
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Conservative Party (UK). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. · &#124; (talk - contributions) 17:23, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed State mergers
The List of proposed state mergers is for real proposals, not for fanciful ideas about what states could jin up. So please stop adding baseless entries. Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 20:57, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Avril Lavigne, you may be blocked from editing.  4TheWynne (talk) (contribs)  11:36, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Edits
Stop making unconstructive edits to Conservative Party (UK) and ignoring reverts by other users. · &#124; (talk - contributions) 10:53, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of proposed state mergers. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of proposed state mergers. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. '' Note that you are engaging in a slow edit war in order to push your own original research. If you believe that you have a case for the content's inclusion in the article, follow WP:BRD and take it to the article's talk page in order to engage in a discussion with other editors. Wikipedia is not a battleground.'' Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism
Dear MilanoLove. Given the number of times that it has been brought to your attention that your edits to [List of proposed state mergers]] are not constructive, added to your failure to engage with others to discuss why you think that your edits are valid, leave me no alternative but to think that your actions are deliberate, which means that your behaviuour amounts to no more than vandalism. I am thus requesting that you be blocked. Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 16:11, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Your recent editing history at List of proposed state mergers shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

List of proposed state mergers
I notice that you have been Edit warring with other users at List of proposed state mergers. While you have not broken the three-revert rule you can still be blocked for edit warring. You need to stop this and take up posting your suggestions at Talk:List of proposed state mergers. Continuing to edit war will lead to blocks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:39, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:59, 29 September 2015 (UTC)