User talk:Milazzoj

Your submission at Articles for creation: King Corn (film) (November 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:King Corn (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:00, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:King Corn (film)


A tag has been placed on Draft:King Corn (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from King Corn (film). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. You may be puzzled why copying an existing article is a copyright violation: the reason is that Wikipedia's CC-BY-SA license allows copying freely, but only on condition that attribution (i.e. credit for their work) is provided to the authors of the material. This is explained at WP:Copying within Wikipedia.


 * In fact, where there is an existing article, as with King Corn (film), it is generally better to edit that rather than make a separate copy to work on, because if both the copy and the actual article are edited in parallel it becomes very difficult to maintain attribution when they are merged again. If you are not sure about your proposed edit, you can post a message on the article talk page to see what other users think, or you can be WP:BOLD and make your change. If others disagree, you may find that it is reverted: in that case, see WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for what you should do - start a discussion on the article talk page to try to reach WP:Consensus with other users.


 * Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:33, 18 November 2016 (UTC)