User talk:MilborneOne/Archive 35

су34
you don't understand the difference. as well as the developers of the f15. su34 sees the aircraft for 300 km and dimensions of 20 meters. but 150 km and the size of 3000 meters if - against the background of water. similarly, the su 35 sees 400 km but 170 if - against the background of the earth. f15 sees almost nothing against the background of the earth /water. similarly, Patriot air defense - only for the plain, not for the mountains.

therefore, the "peak-m" is 300 km but 150 for small ships — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.126.129.27 (talk) 09:45, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry but the sentence is not clear in English and the details that were added dont make much sense. All we need is maximum range otherwise we would neeed to define every target and it is just to much technical detail. MilborneOne (talk) 08:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

I changed the text. and this difference is very important. in the air defense analogy, the Patriot Pak 3 is made as a system against missiles, specifically ballistic missiles. Patriot 1 did not initially have this capability. in the analogy, there are self-propelled artillery and self-propelled artillery, but with the ability to swim+airborne troops. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.126.129.27 (talk) 10:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Not sure I see the relevance. MilborneOne (talk) 10:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

>

Zvartnots Airport + Shirak Airport
There's some edit warring at the pages for Zvartnots International Airport and Shirak Airport. I've raised a ticket at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. As you are both a wikiadmin and also heavily involved in WP:AIRPORT, could I perhaps encourage you to take a look and see if this is something on which you can give an opinion ? Pmbma (talk) 22:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Do we hear a duck quacking?
I'm talking about editor whose edits are almost all disaster-related and who created one article at least with the reminiscent typos/poor English that we have seen so often....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not so sure about this one. It's certainly similar, but Ryan historically can't keep himself from airline-crash articles and I don't see those here, plus this account was editing at the same time the last blocked Ryansock was active. The fact they jumped right in on a draft created by a globally-locked editor, though, may be telling... - The Bushranger One ping only 05:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You make several good points. One other thing I want to point out, is Category:2020 murders in the United Kingdom, which was an early creation by this editor. UK related category creatoions/editing was also a favorite of Ryan K's....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Return with us to those golden days of yesteryear
Way back in May 2007, you added a list of variants to Kaman HH-43 Huskie that includes 1 QH-43G. Your edit did not include a source for this. Might you recall what it might have been? --Lineagegeek (talk) 00:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


 * I think I can remember but give me some time to find the book I used. MilborneOne (talk) 07:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Remove of PROD Template
Hi, since the Editor Andrew Davidson did not inform you per WP:DEPROD I just want to let you know that he removed the PROD Template you placed of Chinook Display Team CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


 * They aren't required to give a notice or an explanation, though it is helpful and courteous. However, they'll have to do better than that at AfD, which they can't just remove, and a "Keep" with no explanation will just be ignored. BilCat (talk) 07:08, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Michael, are you planning on filing an AfD? Just asking. BilCat (talk) 23:57, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reminder Bill, yes I will when I get time. MilborneOne (talk) 14:51, 25 March 2021 (UTC)


 * No problem, I just didn't want to step on your toes by nominating it myself. I'm not sure of work how to word the rationale, so I'll wait. BilCat (talk) 19:33, 25 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Articles for deletion/Chinook Display Team has been raised. MilborneOne (talk) 11:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive and create a worklist at WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

An old user is back
Hi, it's been a while since we've seen that "well-known expert" from Philadelphia, but he's making edits on Bockscar from 2 IP addresses. I don't remember the sock master's name, but it might have been Phil M-something. If you're not around, I'll ask another admin to look at it if they keep reverting. Thanks, and take care. BilCat (talk) 22:38, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!
 Happy Adminship Anniversary! Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Unprotect a long protected article
Hello. A page you semi-protected (Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey) has been semi-protected since 2012. Do you think that seems like a long enough time by now? --LexiTehGallade (talk) 14:11, 4 May 2021 (UTC)


 * I doubt it. Articles on controversial subjects tend to attract various forms of vandalism, and this one is still seen as controversial. BilCat (talk) 20:40, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Ryanair Flight 4978
Do you have a reference for the aircraft type and registration please? Mjroots (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2021 (UTC)


 * It came from FR24 https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/sp-rsm not sure if that is considered reliable. MilborneOne (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Just popped up on flight https://www.flightglobal.com/safety/political-leaders-outraged-as-belarus-forces-ryanair-737-diversion-to-minsk/143868.article MilborneOne (talk) 17:44, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Austrian civil utility aircraft


A tag has been placed on Category:Austrian civil utility aircraft indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

FlyPelican
Please stop taking down FlyPelican in the Embraer EMB 110 Bandeirante because FlyPelican has 3 of those plane and there is photos and videos about them too, so stop erasing it please. Xavierromelf (talk) 17:36, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop taking down FlyPelican from the Fairchild Swearingen Metroliner page because they have 3 planes that they own and is still working today, there is videos and photos about it, so please stop taking it down. Xavierromelf (talk) 17:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Not according to the FlyPelican article and even the FlyPelican website https://flypelican.com.au/our-fleet/jetstream32.html shows Jetstream 32s, have you a reliable source that they have taken on some additional aircraft recently ? MilborneOne (talk) 17:41, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Oh wait sorry I meant about aeropelican sorry fo bother you Xavierromelf (talk) 17:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Can you please move protect Dominicana DC-9 air disaster
It has again been moved to Air Dominicana Flight 603. I moved it back. There have been multiple talk page discussions about the flight. Here is just one of them. Thanks in advance....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Looks like User:Mjroots has already protected it, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 14:43, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


 * A move request has been put in. I'd really like to see a contemporary source for the flight number. Mjroots (talk) 14:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Most of the web sources are wiki mirrors but it is strange than ASN do not mention a flight number, they are usually good at collecting data. MilborneOne (talk) 14:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Antonov An-26
Then why it's in lead and in title? Why such inconsistency? Eurohunter (talk) 20:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


 * It was a project consensus so if you have an issue then please raise it at WP:AIRCRAFT. thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 06:17, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Project consensus contrary to Wikipedia standards? Could you link it? What is the point to have cuted name just in infobox and only there? Eurohunter (talk) 15:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The consensus is at WikiProject Aircraft/page content. Which Wikipedia policy or guideline does this contradict? Can you please link to it? BilCat (talk) 22:27, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Deletion requests
Hi Michael, could you delete Turbomeca Turmo 2 gas producer and Turbomeca Turmo 3 gas producer. These are some of Petebutt's leftover redirects that link from nowhere. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 08:51, 5 June 2021 (UTC)


 * MilborneOne (talk) 08:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks! That was fast. BilCat (talk) 08:56, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Solar Impulse
Hi. Can you please tell me what changes can be made in this article in order to publish it in this page?


 * You need to raise it on the talk page Talk:Solar Impulse and make a case why your additons are relevant and noteworthy. MilborneOne (talk) 10:57, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Austrian civil aircraft


A tag has been placed on Category:Austrian civil aircraft indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 14:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I have just added two company's product range to this category, is the intention to kill it because of the other category that includes Austro-Hungary? Please depopulate if so but there was no explanatory note on the category or talk page. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by)  17:17, 16 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Not sure whats going on, Austria is clearly not the same entity as austro-hungarian which most people relate to first world war aircraft not gliders etc. Not found the discussion yet. MilborneOne (talk) 18:35, 16 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I would agree. Thought I did see something about it recently but can't remember where, difficult to keep track sometimes.Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by)  19:55, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Found it, a glider category was flagged at WT:AIR last month, Austrian but not related to this civil aircraft category.Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by)  20:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * It appears that a single editor doesn't like it and has depopulated it again. Depopulating and slapping on a speedy tag isn't the right way to delete categories that have not been discussed (and need discussion). Austria and Austro-Hungary should be treated separately. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by)  07:54, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * it looks like the project templates have been changed on 21 May without discussion refer Template:Airnd MilborneOne (talk) 13:10, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Emptying categories out-of-process has been an ongoing problem at CFD and it's being done by veteran editors, not newbies. It usually only becomes evident when some categories show up on the daily empty category list. Since there is no permanent record of a category's contents, it can be a challenge to work backwards and figure out what has been removed from it. It seems to be mostly happening to categories related to a nation/nation-state, especially over the past two hundred years as borders have changed. Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You bring up a good point here. It seems there is some confusion, even among experienced editors as to the procedure. So once a talk page discussion has concluded to eliminate some child categories as part of a reorganization, is it then okay to depopulate them and tag them for speedy or should this all be handled differently? I ask specifically because I am involved in just that right now at Category talk:Linux distributions. - Ahunt (talk) 13:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Related is an apparent recent change in the wiki software, I am now seeing 'diffs' in my watchlist when a category is removed (or presumably added?) to an article, the actual diff is not clickable but the article is blue highlighted. You have to be watching the category of course but it should reduce the emptying/speedy stealth route of category removal without discussion or notice. I can't find where this change was implemented but it's very useful. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by)  14:41, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. It concerns Dominicana DC-9 air disaster and Username006....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:07, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Fixed
Hello! Can I ask you a favor if you can fixed the Rossiya Airlines, the last edit version of User:Edberezina. Thanks! Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 17:24, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Air Canada Flight 018 Stowaway Incident
You sent this article to AfD two years ago, where it was "kept". At that time I thought it was strictly WP:NOTNEWS and should have been deleted, but others disagreed then. It seems this week that a number of editors think it should be done away with through one or more odd means, however well-intentioned or not. Over time there has been no more information on the incident with which to expand the article and so, to me, it still seems like a merely curious news story and nothing more. We never found out who the person was or anything about his circumstances or even if he was granted asylum in Canada or deported as this is all protected information here in Canada, due to privacy laws. The article still seems totally non-encyclopedic to me. Do you think we should send it to a second AfD or just leave it? - Ahunt (talk) 14:44, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I would agree it is not really noteworthy to keep and another AfD needs to be done. What happened here is that somebody who didnt like the article changed it to some junk copyrighted text not related to the article and then sent it to AfD saying it was a copyright violation! They didnt create the AfD properly so I had to do a tidy up. They also redirected the article which has earned them a disruption block. Whatever we think of the article there is a right and wrong way to get a community consensus either way ! MilborneOne (talk) 15:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I saw both of those happen. Thanks for reverting that. When the one editor tried to just redirect it, I reverted and indicated that he really couldn't overrule the last AfD and redirect it like that, especially to a new target article that was off-topic. Did you want to start a new AfD then or should I, since you started the last one? - Ahunt (talk) 15:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I dont mind but I am away for a few hours soon so if you have not got around to it I will do it later on. MilborneOne (talk) 15:40, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah I am tied up here for a few hours - so we will see who gets there first! - Ahunt (talk) 16:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Just a reminder that the copyvio text needs to be removed from the article history. I've left a message on the Great Canadian Copyvio Guru User: Diannaa's talk page to request this. BilCat (talk) 20:50, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Well I made the AfD nomination at Articles for deletion/Air Canada Flight 018 Stowaway incident, but I am not sure I did it right. Because the article title capitalization has changed since the last AfD, this one is not indicated as a second nomination. Does that need fixing? - Ahunt (talk) 22:45, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Yes, but I don't know how. BilCat (talk) 23:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * One of the editors there commenting at least linked it to he last AfD, so that may suffice. - Ahunt (talk) 23:03, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Ok. Also, if kept, shouldn't "stowaway" in the title be lower case? BilCat (talk) 23:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I was thinking that too, not sure what happened there or who did that. - Ahunt (talk) 23:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Well it looks like this AfD should wrap-up today and it looks like it will probably be kept again. It wasn't the intended aim, but at least the AfD had a positive effect on the article, which has been expanded. - Ahunt (talk) 21:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)


 * There does come a point were it was not worth the effort to argue about deletion despite the flimsy reasons to keep. I am still of the opinion that it has nothing to do with being a stowaway as they clearly had a ticket to travel so it more to do with fraud. MilborneOne (talk) 09:39, 4 July 2021 (UTC)


 * I agree. He had a ticket, so he was not a stowaway. Despite the addition of a large amount of mostly irrelevant text in an attempt to make the article more "fluffy", we still only have a person who came to Canada in a rubber mask and claimed asylum, for undisclosed reasons. He was one of tens of thousands of people who did that in 2010, many of whom used human smugglers too, just the rest didn't wear a mask. Anyway, in general, AfD discussions seem to favour keeping anything with a National Enquirer flavour, so it is little surprise that is the case here. - Ahunt (talk) 13:35, 4 July 2021 (UTC)


 * LOL, the debate got re-listed, so another week of pain. - Ahunt (talk) 13:45, 4 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Yup. Pointless. BilCat (talk) 21:26, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Aircraft manufactured by Yugoslavia


A tag has been placed on Category:Aircraft manufactured by Yugoslavia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:02, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Olympic Appearance
Please go to the All-time Olympic Games medal table page, sort by N° of participation at Summer Games then you will see that only four countries have participated at every Games under their names : France, Great Britain, Greece and Switzerland. It is not the case for Australia : they participate in 1908 and in 1912 under the name Australasia !

So it's totally not true to say than Australia have participated in every games under their name : and the claim made in the Australia at the 2020 Summer Olympics and the page for Greece, France and Switzerland are not true... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pindrice (talk • contribs)


 * So if you believe that then you should update all the Australian olympic articles, there is few. But I wouldnt be sure that the AOC didnt consider it had been at all the games. MilborneOne (talk) 19:11, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:08, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion
Please send a proposed deletion notify when you proposed to deletion a article next time. Thank you. -- ToprakM &thinsp;✉ 23:30, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Tailless mules
Thanks for the clarification in the DH Swallow article. I've never come across this term before- is it generally used?TheLongTone (talk) 13:51, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Not a term I had ever heard before. MilborneOne (talk) 13:50, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of FlightGlobal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FlightGlobal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/FlightGlobal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LukeWWF (talk) 11:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hai can I talk about this change here? —14:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Echo1Charlie (talk)


 * You can but we dont use the categories I removed. MilborneOne (talk) 14:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I have checked category, and saw other fighter are still listed in there that's why I asked.—Echo1Charlie (talk) 14:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)


 * They shouldnt be its a nonsense category as the generations are really just made up by fanboys and marketing teams. MilborneOne (talk) 14:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Really needs nominating for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 14:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, Thanks for the clarification, Have a nice day.—Echo1Charlie (talk) 14:23, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Reason of making page
Hi MilborneOne, reason why I had created the page Sterna Linhas Aéreas Flight 9302 is because the airline is noteworthy to mention. You see, had it been a huge airline with one aircraft loss is un-noteworthy. However, this airline only had one aircraft and that aircraft loss is not clearly mentioned on the airline page. The airline went out of business after the aircraft loss. However, I must mention that I did not mean to directly create the page. It should have been created as a draft such as the one I'm working on: Draft:USA Jet Airlines Flight 199. I'm really busy currently, that's why I'm unable to improve the page. That's all. Thanks! KlientNo.1 (talk) 01:26, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Lockheed P-38 Lightning
Hey, back in 2015 you added some references to Lockheed P-38 Lightning here, but only listed a reference as "Andrade 1979". Can you remember which book it was? I'm wanting it filled out properly so the references on the page are fully sorted CiphriusKane (talk) 15:08, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * User:CiphriusKane Ooops forgot to add it - now done. MilborneOne (talk) 11:21, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Dublin Airport
Please add the fully protected topicon to Dublin Airport. Sungodtemple (talk) 14:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Dont normally add it as there is a bot that does it. MilborneOne (talk) 19:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Also in relation to Dublin Airport, the page has been protected for a week now. Is there some discussion on it somewhere? Not sure what the point of blocking everyone from editing it is... Thanks, VG31 16:05, 27 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Discussion should be held on the article talk page to sort out the dispute. The blocking was to stop an edit war and encourage discussion. MilborneOne (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Citilink Removed From Using Boeing U3 Code
Good Morning, Afternoon, Evening Introduces me JGNTHA. I want to protest, why do you arbitrarily remove Citilink from the Boeing U3 Aircraft Code List. Even though it is clear that Citilink has a 737-5U3 cargo plane. Even though it's an ex-Garuda Commercial Plane, if Citilink has a Boeing Fleet Like 737 Or What, it means that the airline is included in the Boeing U3 List Code. — Preceding 05:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC) comment added by JGNTHA contribs) 14:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


 * I have removed it again - these codes only apply to new aircraft not second-hand. MilborneOne (talk) 18:57, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Please don't be arbitrary in editing the list of Boeing U3, you are not Indonesian. Why do you even know more about the planes on the Boeing U3 list? It doesn't matter whether the plane is new or not. However, if the plane uses a Boeing codenamed U3, it means it must be included in the list. Citilink is a subsidiary of Garuda. So there's no harm in using Code and it's legit. Citilink Owns a Boeing 737-5U3F. This Aircraft Registration is PK-GGC. User:JGNTHA contribs 05:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC)


 * User:JGNTHA Wikipedia is an encyclopedia anybody can edit, you dont have to be Indonesian. I have no doubt that citilink have a 737 with a U3 code but that customer code was allocated by Boeing when the aircraft was built for Garuda. It tells them it has various options that Garuda had asked for. When the aircraft is sold the code does not change and still reflects the original customer. As far as I can tell Citilink have never bought any new aircraft from Boeing and certainly PK-GGC was bought by Garuda in 1997. MilborneOne (talk) 06:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Pointless Editing
Can you please explain to me what possible addition to Wikipedia it is to leave a resolved and very trivial issue on the talk page. Apart from boosting an editor's ego by increasing the number and visibility of his edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris.Bristol (talk • contribs) 19:42, 7 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Did you read the guidance in the link I provided ? also you may need to reel back the comments on other editors motives, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 12:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Militi M.B.1 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Militi M.B.1 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Militi M.B.1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:力百 (alt of power~enwiki, π,  ν ) 16:49, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

RAF Wing Commanders
Not a category I created. Might be worth you starting a discussion for deletion of the cat if you don't see it as useful as it's a well populated cat Kingbird1 (talk) 13:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank I have nominated it for deletion as well as the Sqn Ldr cat at Categories for discussion/Log/2021 November 21. MilborneOne (talk) 13:23, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * You might need to nominate the American equivalents as they fit together with these --Kingbird1 (talk) 13:47, 21 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Not bothered about the American ones as I dont understand them as well as the RAF, certainly the RAF ones are stupid, An AVM would be in the Air Commodore, Group Captain, Wing Commander and Squadron Leader categories clearly looks daft. Its also really hard to find anything as all these categories are diffused into smaller and smaller definitions. MilborneOne (talk) 14:35, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

FFA P-16
Hi Michael, can you consider some semi-protection for FFA P-16? The sock farm of the banned Sockpuppet investigations/FFA P-16 has returned to add contested information pushed that user. It's possible this is a meat puppet, as the IP is from England, but their English is still poor, as was the banned user's. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 21:56, 21 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Semi-protected MilborneOne (talk) 15:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much! BilCat (talk) 22:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

2022
Why Did you Delete the one for events and deaths for. 98.186.54.177 (talk) 19:35, 30 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Because it was to early, they can be put back when we have something to add, and it is not 2022 yet. MilborneOne (talk) 21:01, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - January 2022
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Two cents
Hi there, over the past couple of years, users (mostly new users or IP's) have been adding "international" to the titles of Indian airports. I thought of coming up with some sort of rough guidelines which could be refined and gradually make their way to WP:AV and/or WP:IND. I'm not sure if someone else has come up with this in the past, but I believe its time we have them so that we can point to users why their edit was reverted. If you've got the time I'd like some feedback on this. Thanks! Bingo bro  (Chat)  15:32, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:43, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Proposed aircraft of Spain


A tag has been placed on Category:Proposed aircraft of Spain indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:18, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Allstar PZL Glider
Hello, MilborneOne. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Allstar PZL Glider, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

14th Adminship Anniversary!
 Wishing MilborneOne a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman ( talk ) 14:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

MoD West Freugh/RAF West Freugh
Hello

Can you please delete MoD West Freugh so i can move RAF West Freugh there?

T3E MoD Canmore QinetiQ

Thanks Gavbadger (talk) 19:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)