User talk:Milenioscuro/File1

For any comments or suggestions please go to my main account Shadowxfox in the Spanish Wikipedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Dahlialbum.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dahlialbum.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:XJ_LiveExtra.jpg
I have tagged Image:XJ_LiveExtra.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  19:38, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Weekendx.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Weekendx.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

X Japan Returns 1993.12.31
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of X Japan Returns 1993.12.31, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: X Japan Returns 1993.12.30. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Best ~Fan's Selection~
I have nominated Best ~Fan's Selection~, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Best ~Fan's Selection~. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 21:39, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Colombia coat of arms
Si viejo, modifiquela no hay problema. Gracias por preguntar !--Camilo Sanchez (talk) 04:14, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Flag of Ecuador
Thanks for the reply, just wanted to make sure there was a source for that, since an IP changed it. Rodface (talk) 22:25, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Complete Singles


A tag has been placed on Complete Singles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jpross123 Editor for Wikipedia 14:53, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Complete Singles


A tag has been placed on Complete Singles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jpross123 Editor for Wikipedia 14:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Complete Singles


The article Complete Singles has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NALBUMS as it is a bootleg. No sources are given.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Xfansd (talk) 18:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Colombia municipalities map
Colombia had some changes that increased the number of municipalities (municipios). The shape file map of Colombia listed on http://gadm.org/ doesn't contain the new boundaries. The older municipality maps listed at match the gadm.org boundaries

What is the source of the new map of Colombia listed at  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.64.137 (talk) 16:08, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Discussion which you may wish to join
You updated the image page File:Map of state religions.svg. That image page was used as an example in a currently-ongoing discussion at Wikipedia talk:Verifiability. You may be interested in joining that discussion. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 17:43, 10 February 2013 (UTC)