User talk:Milinpatel1369/Pontic Greek Project

Final Review
Hi Milin, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:


 * 1) Language: There is a lot of redundancy, and the article could have been better proofed. The definite article is often missing. 3 points.
 * 2) Structure: The article follows its own structure; the information could have been better organized (e.g. endangerment and official status under one category). 4 points.
 * 3) Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
 * 4) Accuracy: It is difficult to assess the accuracy of the article as none of the claims are supported by references. There is a bibliography but it is not clear how it relates to the text. 1 point.
 * 5) Relevance: Not all of the information is relevant to the subject (the section on festivals; the examples are also words from standard Greek and not unique to Pontic Greek). 4 points.
 * 6) Length: Word count 1851/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 4 points.

The final score is 21/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 21:02, 12 May 2021 (UTC)