User talk:MilkisWack1065/sandbox

Ceili's peer review
I want to start the review with a positive point your writing doesn't seem to be bias and I don't feel that you are trying to convince me of anything which is really good. Over all I don't see a lot of structure here in that I am having a hard time imagining exactly how you plan on organizing the information you have here but this might have to do with the scarcity of information here. Is each bullet point meant to be a sensitive or is it more likely going to fuel your thought for multiple sentences each? I think you could definitely improve the number of sources you are drawing from, that being said I know how hard it is to find sources on Chinese topics in English so maybe you can check with a few teachers in the program and ask if they can help you find some good sources or even check in the library, I have had a librarian help me find sources in the past and have been met with a decent degree of success. You should also try to broaden what you plan to talk about beyond the meihua, this may be a main point of interest but it is important to evenly cover multiple aspects of your topic. That being said I don't know how hard it will be for you to find appropriate sources for other information because I am sadly not well versed with Fan Chengda. I feel some what unsure of what the importance of this article is with what is currently here so I hope you can bring in enough information to convey the importance of this page to future readers. I would love to be able to look at this page and immediately be able to tell the significance of it but right now I can't. If you fix this problem that would be a great way to drastically improve the current article. The current page is very scares and it clearly could use more sections but until more is added it is hard to comment on structure as there doesn't seem to be any currently present. I think once you track some solid sources with a little more meat to them you will be able to whip this article right into shape you just have to get on it and really work it. It is nice you seem to be at least throw when it comes to the information you do have available thus far about the meihua, as long as you approach all other aspects of the page like this you will have a very well full feeling page. AnniePJordan (talk) 03:44, 6 March 2019 (UTC)AnniePJordanAnniePJordan (talk) 03:44, 6 March 2019 (UTC)