User talk:Milkshake6789

Speedy deletion nomination of of Kitty kat (tv seires)
A tag has been placed on Kitty kat (tv seires), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G3 candidate, reading through it the article clearly comprises of a blatant hoax.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Guest9999 (talk) 11:55, 29 July 2009 (UTC) Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. (Zaxby (talk) 13:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC))

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GSK (talk ● evidence) 19:33, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

January 2010
Your recent edit to the page Eleventh Doctor appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  Lord Speaker  ─╢ 16:50, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Toy Story 3: The Video Game has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Happysailor (Talk) 14:30, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 24 hours, for vandalism on multiple articles, including Toy Story 3. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lego Batman 2:The Next Adventure


The article Lego Batman 2:The Next Adventure has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Absolutely no evidence any of this is true.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I42 (talk) 17:07, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of Doctor Who serials. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. magnius (talk) 20:38, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Brandon flowers.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Brandon flowers.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:19, 19 October 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:19, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Maroon 5 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 16:25, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Maroon 5 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 16:27, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Robbie WIlliams
You uploaded an image with the same name as an existing free image; doing so overwrote that image. Please reupload with a different filename and provide proper licensing information. Thanks. Rodhull andemu  19:08, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Lego-Pirates1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lego-Pirates1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Assassin's Creed: Revelations. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  So Why  12:10, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Doctor Who serials, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Ebyabe (talk) 18:15, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Woman in Black (2012 film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 15:05, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Peter Kay with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  B a i l o 26  17:03, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. IRWolfie- (talk) 17:18, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7
Hi. When you recently edited The Woman in Black (2012 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liz White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to The X Factor (UK series 9). Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GimliDotNet ( Speak to me, Stuff I've done )  16:01, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Craig, you may be blocked from editing. - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 19:29, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Skyfall, you may be blocked from editing. - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 20:11, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Skyfall. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 72Dino (talk) 20:22, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

3RR
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 20:50, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Conservative Party (UK), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=495815558 here]. Wiki13 (talk) 19:10, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Anne Hathaway, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Sky Machine  ( ++ ) 12:41, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:"Anne Hathaway June 2012.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:"Anne Hathaway June 2012.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Anne Hathaway. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 15:46, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Anne Hathaway. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please don't forget WP:3RR, so soon after your last infringement. Old Moonraker (talk) 15:48, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is User:Milkshake6789 reported by User:Old Moonraker (Result: ). Thank you. --Old Moonraker (talk) 17:20, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Anne Hathaway shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  17:39, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Toy Story (franchise), you will be blocked from editing. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  17:41, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for WP:BLP violations, edit-warring, tendentious editing, and all-round lack of competence. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 17:48, 13 June 2012 (UTC)


 * This is ironic considering that I don't think you have made a single constructive edit to Wikipedia yet ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 17:50, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:"Anne Hathaway June 2012.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:"Anne Hathaway June 2012.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:26, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Recent edits - 29 June 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at George Osborne, you may be blocked from editing. - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 18:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ricky Gervais, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 18:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Based on the two edits above: Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 19:01, 29 June 2012 (UTC)