User talk:Mill2488/sandbox

This is where the peer review feedback for Mill2488's sandbox draft content should be posted. Be sure to sign your post and complete the Canvas quiz to receive credit for your work. UWM.AP.Endo (talk) 03:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Yes, the content is written in a neutral, unbiased tone.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? Yes, the citations follow the MEDRS guidelines.

Are the citations formatted correctly? Yes, the citations are formatted correctly.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to. Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? Yes, it makes sense to add the new content. It gives a detailed explanation of IGF-1 and its effects.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? The author can contribute to the causes of elevated IGF-1 levels.

JM1915 (talk)JM1915

Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone?

Yes

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines?

No indications that its trying to influence a medical opinion on treatment so it follows MEDRS guidelines

Are the citations formatted correctly?

Yes but I will say it seems strange that the majority of the suggested section entails a single source and its only the last sentence that cites the second source and the information you want to include from that seems to already be in the mechanism of action section for both growth hormone and insulin functions.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to. Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? Yes

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? yes they could add the ubiquitous nature of IGF-1 to the opening background information In Vita Veritas (talk) 20:51, 21 November 2020 (UTC)