User talk:Millelacs/Archive 5

Nodepx deletion
Hi, I would leave the AfD in place in case the speedy is declined. If the speedy is accepted, the closing admin will remove the AfD anyway. Regards, WWGB (talk) 05:53, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Jayashree V Bappal
Hello,

I have deleted Jayashree V Bappal, as the user doesn't appear to be interested in supplying more content. Your tagging was technically correct, however I strongly encourage you not to tag pages A1/A3 immediately after creation. New users often type a few words a hit save as a sort of test. By tagging the article instantly, you are potentially sending a single "your contribution is not welcome" which might cause them not to write the rest the (potentially useful) article they were intending to write. There is no hurry to tag such articles, so please give people a chance to write more in the future.

Thanks, ThaddeusB (talk) 06:25, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

RFA
Hi

you should think about what kind of administrative work you want to do. Do you want to edit protected pages? Do you want to close controversial discussions? Block vandals, delete pages, protect pages? Then do more work related to that area. Two months of good work should prove your interest and skill. Also many find that RFA is a stressful week, so are you ready to have all your mistakes criticized? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:10, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi dci. I just thought I'd drop you a not here rather than your editor review, mostly because I don't have time to do a full review. Generally when people ask me about becoming an administrator, I check them against how they hold up to my magic formula (which I've only just put on wiki) - and at the moment, you're not quite there. Graeme Bartlett has given you some great advice though, I'd suggest you'd take it. Keep on doing what you're doing, focus on quality of edits and I'm sure you'll be ready to run in a few months. Perhaps give me another shout in the summer - I'll do a full review and see how you hold up for a nomination then if you like?  WormTT   &middot; &#32;(talk) 15:52, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:06, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Security
Just a notice – I had posted, using an IP address account, that activity would be limited due to security concerns. Though the concerns were all too real at the moment, they have been addressed and there was no risk of my account being compromised. dci &#124;  TALK   04:01, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Help us develop better software!
Thanks to all of you for commenting on the NOINDEX RfC :). It's always great to be able to field questions like these to the community; it's genuinely the highlight of my work! The NOINDEX idea sprung from our New Page Triage discussion; we're developing a new patrolling interface for new articles, and we want your input like never before :). So if you haven't already seen it, please go there, take a look at the screenshots and mockups and ideas, and add any comments or suggestions you might have to the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:46, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Vlastimir of Serbia
Hi DCI. I think you might have forgotten about this. It is probably ready to be closed. AIR corn (talk) 00:24, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 14:32, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

lol!
Hey, no probs. I no longer use Wikipedia or contribute, but I noticed your snafu on Template:Citation needed :-) Not a problem - these things happen! - 114.76.227.0 (talk) 16:21, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, and P.S. this is an Optusnet Cable Internet IP address. It's shared amongst a LOT of users of Optusnet. The above comment shouldn't be seen as me in any way coming back to Wikipedia (I had my talk pages deleted). Unfortunately, I need to make this clear as there are a number of Wikipedia editors (a number of whom have long since left, thank goodness) who would like me to be harassed and exposed by having the pages reinstated. Regrettably I need to add this disclaimer in case anyone thinks that they need to "reinstate" my account, against my express wishes. I'm merely replying to let you know that no harm has been done :-) 114.76.227.0 (talk) 16:25, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm thinking you might have intended to reply to someone else; I don't recall having anything to do with this template and don't remember any conversation with you before.  dci  &#124;  TALK   16:48, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, you did. - 114.76.227.0 (talk) 09:56, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh! Now I remember!  I was beginning to use Twinkle, I believe, and, well... :)  dci  &#124;  TALK   23:08, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:47, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:12, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 26 August 2012 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding  to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:02, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:45, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: Stanisław Poniatowski (1676–1762)
Thanks for the heads up. Incidentally, would you be interested in offering a second opinion in the GA review of his son, Stanisław August Poniatowski? The review there has stalled (reviewer's first review, and he is inactive since August 16th). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 15:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No hurry. I have outstanding GAN from March/April. A week, at this point, is no longer a time unit I care about that much :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 00:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Military history coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Page Curation newsletter
Hey. I'm dropping you a note because you've been using the Page Curation suite recently - this is just to let you know that we've deployed the final version :). There's some help documentation Page Curation/Introductionhere that shows off all the features, just in case there are things you're not familiar with. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 11:50, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Antonio Luna/GA1
A forgotten review? AIR corn (talk) 05:51, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:30, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Robert L. Eichelberger/GA1
Finished with this yet? Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:27, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Bajkam and Tuzun
Hi, I saw that you were interested in creating articles on Bajkam and Tuzun. In addition to the history of Miskawayh in The Eclipse of the Abbasid caliphate, the Akhbar al-Radi billah wa al-Muttaqi lillah by Muhammad ibn Yahya al-Suli is another highly relevant primary source. It covers the history of the Abbasid caliphate from 323-333 A.H./934-944 A.D. and extensively details the careers of the two men. I've seen some versions of the book online, and some major libraries also carry it. Unfortunately I don't believe any English translations are available yet, but if you're interested you should definitely check it out. For secondary sources, The Buwayhid Dynasty in Iraq 334 H./945 to 403 H./1012 by John J. Donahue would probably be a worthwhile read, as would Histoire de la dynastie des Hamdanides de Jazira et de Syrie by Marius Canard.

I hope this information helps you out. Hope to see the articles soon! Ro4444 (talk) 18:03, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 02:24, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Invasions of the British Isles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Invasions of the British Isles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Invasions of the British Isles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. dci &#124;  TALK   01:08, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Peer review
I re-opened the peer review. It is standard for the bot to close them if there are no comments in a certain amount of time, but usually they get some comments when they are opened. You may want to leave a polite note at WT:PR to see if there are people who can review it. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 23:06, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Bajkam
The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

FYI
Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 20:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Countries that Britain has attacked
I have always been impressed by Wikipedia and I am now beginning to know why. Reading all the comments that people have placed in the delete article talk section has been most informative. I have often used the article List of wars involving Great Britain (and similar list articles) and when doing so thought that instead constructing the list by war and then by protagonist one could list by country and then my war. Of course, one could do this for all countries. However, the one I was most interested in was my own. Perhaps if I had kept the article simple it might have worked. Begin with a tight list and expand if the need arises. I am not preciously bound to the article that I have created but I do think the idea useful. I might need to begin again. However, I am getting a sense, from you and from others, that such an endeavour is a pejorative exercise against Britain - it certainly wasn't meant to be so. The book came out of nowhere for me - my wife laughed when she told me about the book "you are not the only one". That you for sharing your thoughtsDavroche (talk) 21:09, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Mortimer Grimshaw
Hi, just letting you know that I've addressed some of your comments and replied on the review page just in case you don't have it on your watchlist. Cheers, BigDom (talk) 20:43, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification of user conduct discussion
You may wish to comment on a user conduct discussion regarding Paul Bedson, which can be found here. If you comment there you may wish to review the rules for user conduct comments first. You are receiving this notification because you commented at one of the articles or AfDs that are cited in the discussion. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:58, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

RfA
Hi. If you are contemplating RfA any time soon, you may wish to check out WP:Advice for RfA candidates and all its linked footnotes and pages. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:09, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Canterbury Tales task force
The newly-created task force for The Canterbury Tales now has its own page: WP:CANTWP, and discussion is beginning to take place on the talk page over various crucial issues. Hope you can participate! MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 19:09, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, J J Vallaya
Hey, thaks so much...I did notice the same after creating the article & therefore I only tagged it of duplication & merger. Please delete the article as it is actually duplicate however, it was unintentional. Callousfreak (talk) 09:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for commenting at the RfC at Portal talk:Judaism. --  YPN YPN  02:26, 19 December 2012 (UTC)