User talk:MillenniumTwink2004

Welcome!
Hello, MillenniumTwink2004, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Maverick (roller coaster) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! GoneIn60 (talk) 21:30, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Millennium Force, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 03:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

To add to the message above, it appears you believe your work experience at Cedar Point can be used on Wikipedia to verify information you add (as you describe in your comments here), but unfortunately it cannot. Please be sure to read through No original research to understand more about why this is a problem. Also be sure to carefully read WP:V to understand why it's important to cite sources for information you add that has a reasonable chance of being challenged, as well as WP:RS to understand what qualifies as a reliable source. I'm not sure you've quite grasped these concepts yet. If you need any assistance, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or ask other veteran editors at the Teahouse. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 05:36, 11 January 2024 (UTC)