User talk:Millerkhandhar

National varieties of English
Hello. In a recent edit to the page The Invisible Man (2000 TV series), you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 10:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Extended play. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ''Hi! Please don't swap spellings to British English unless the article is specifically British. Otherwise, keep up the good work!'' Blue Edits (talk) 16:21, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Ullu, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ullu, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:10, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ullu, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 12:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)


 * HI,
 * I believe the content in question is more of an acquisition and trying to sabotage the brand "Ullu" by siting the reference of the allegations and derogatory remarks. If you feel i am right on my observation, please help with removal of the content Millerkhandhar (talk) 12:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)