User talk:Millermk/Archive (2011)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Millermk90. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! - 2/0 (cont.) 18:18, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:21, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Your rollback request
Hello Millermk90, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead, use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 10:36, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

International American University
Hi Millermk90,

I noticed your Reverted edits by 27.4.34.93 (talk) to last version by 115.249.68.50 on the IAU page. However, you left in a what appears to be a non-relevant comment under the "Degree Programs" heading. Shouldn't this be removed as well? Your comments would be helpful as I was thinking of updating the page when I saw your reverted edits. Thanks. Audit Guy (talk) 01:01, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

IAU Clean-up
Hi Millermk90,

I saw the entry changes. Many thanks for the manual clean-up! :) Audit Guy (talk) 12:14, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Scott Newman
About the Scott Newman page, why did you delete my editing? --Binnyrules (talk) 19:43, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

So I can write about the fan page but no references to twitter of fb? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Binnyrules (talk • contribs) 19:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Toronto Transit Commission
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Proactiv Solution
They are scamers please don't support their methods — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.193.28 (talk) 03:24, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Reply
Hi! :) left a message for you here -- MST  ☆  R   (Chat Me!) 08:25, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Hi Millermk90. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Enchanted river hinatuan, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. A7 does not apply to geographical articles Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:55, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Cat Behavior
So the part about cats actually making biscuits was a joke, but the behavior is in reality called "making biscuits," so you didn't have to remove that sentence as well. :) RE: Cat_behavior — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.215.177.72 (talk) 08:33, December 13, 2011‎ (UTC)

Lockheed F-104 Starfighter revert
When you made this revert, you in fact reverted the removal of information by the IP editor that originally added the same information. The fact that you templated the IP editor for correcting his or her own work seems a little un-necessary and bity. The material that you restored was uncited, almost indecipherable and was really outside the scope of the article.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Uzbekistan national rescued from the flesh trade
I have given a reference for the comment I made, then why was that removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.22.113 (talk) 00:17, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with D. Y. Patil college of Engineering and Technology, Kolhapur. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t &bull; c &raquo;  03:35, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm guessing...
that you did the same thing I always accidentally do? xD Glacialfox (talk) 21:03, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Contradiction salvador agron
I see that you reverted my recent edit to salvador agron bio. I merely wanted to point out to anyone that the article contradicts itself. I would imagine that you couldn't understand this or simply don't care. One section says gang fight and then two paragraphs later says the gang never showed up and they jumped a bunch of innocent kids. Am I to surmise that those two statements are inline and agree with one another.

I think maybe the first paragraph should be rewritten that this juvenile delinquent was a thief, truant, bully and eventually became a murdering punk. He should have fried 50 years ago and not had his sentenced commuted.

I think romantizing criminals and thugs on wikipedia is embellishement (at the very least) and that all such articles should be reviewed for NPOV and verifiable sources because this one reads like a fictional romance novel about a punk that was nothing but a burden on society. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.32.55.194 (talk) 05:39, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

I agree totally that article need verifiable sources cited within. This is the law of the land in Wikipedia. However, it seems that Wikipedia does not follow this procedure when it comes to anything puera rican. This article has so many bytes and facts, stats and information. Yet, the references are not their and the embellishement is extraordinary. Im sorry, but this seems to be wikipedia is becoming pompous and arrogant with the allowance to certain ethnic groups and their bogus claims of importance. Do not misunderstand me, I married a PR, but this has got to stop.

The above would not be so bad if the article made the PR look good without making another ethnic group look bad. I mean WTF? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.32.55.194 (talk) 05:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Malda College‎
Thank you for reporting RaktimBanerjee for me. I actually had no clue where to report him/her - I didn't think AIV would have been appropriate - but looks it to me, now. On another note, I see in two more days it will be your one year anniversary of being an editor here on Wikipedia ! Congratulations :) I had mine yesterday. -- MST  ☆  R   (Chat Me!) 06:45, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Malda College article changes
changes are not saved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RaktimBanerjee (talk • contribs) 06:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Birth Dates in lede
Not sure why you removed the date of birth from the first paragraph of Michael_Bublé. If you look at any random article about any other musician, you'll see that there's both a birth date in the first paragraph and in the infobox. In fact, infoboxes are the things that are optional. See WP:Disinfoboxes.--Larrybob (talk) 08:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Dwarfism
But Gollum is a Dwarf why did you say that was vandalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.97.197.184 (talk) 23:35, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion of Sofia Noorbakhshia.
Hi Millermk90, just wanted to let you know i removed the proposed speedy deletion of Sofia Noorbakhshia.. The CSD:G1 criteria is deliberately narrowly defined as "pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content". The page in question doesn't meet that standard. I've proposed it for deletion instead. Best, Sparthorse (talk) 10:48, 19 December 2011 (UTC)