User talk:Millernicole

Welcome!
Hello, Millernicole, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Garycompugeek (talk) 17:48, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

article disruption
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Renee Olstead, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stranded Pirate (talk • contribs) 01:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Millernicole, in my view, your removal of the material added by Stranded Pirate was not unconstructive and did not warrant the above warning. Of course, you're new, and I'm not sure what your motives were for the removal, but I didn't want you to be discouraged by Stranded Pirate's warning. If you have any questions, feel free to post them here, and I'll try to answer them.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:21, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * yes, please ignore any of the rules regarding white washing. Stranded Pirate (talk) 00:13, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Renee Olstead. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - You have been warned previously of this. Please stop it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stranded Pirate (talk • contribs) 20:36, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Rene Olmstead
I carefully reworked Stranded Pirate's contribution, and believe that I made it fully compliant with all policies. What is your objection to my version?&mdash;Kww(talk) 19:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, Kww, your version (slightly modified by Stranded Pirate), was definitely an improvement on the original. Part of the problem is SP is adding this material in lots of articles in the same "overwhelming" form. See, for example Mila Kunis. Obviously, because of the ramifications of how much it affected each celebrity, each article has to be taken on a case-by-case basis, but it's a disturbing pattern. Putting aside those global issues for the moment, there were a couple of things wrong with the smaller form, one of which I fixed, and one of which I didn't. There's no cited source supporting the sentencing date, so I removed that, uh, sentence. It's also not really necessary, anyway. The second problem is it has a glaring gap. it doesn't say that he was convicted. In fact, he pled guilty, which is in the Kunis article, but I haven't put it in the Olstead article. If the material is to remain, it has to go in there for obvious reasons. Based on the Talk page discussion, even the small form (much smaller than in Olstead) may go away completely because three of us believe it's not noteworthy enough for Kunis. Olstead may be a different story, but I still wish we could get away from the details of the Chaney case and just focus on the celebrity herself, i.e., making it even shorter.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:51, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * SP reverted my edit because the July 23 setencing date is in a previous citation in the paragraph. Unfortunately, he also reintroduced errors that I had fixed. I don't intend to touch it again, even to fix the citation and punctuation errors. I'll let you deal with him. Just to reiterate, even sourced, the date Chaney is going to be sentenced is unimportant for any of these articles, including Olstead, and not worthy of inclusion.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * i saw what you did and didn't realize the error i had made. i reverted it back to yours.  Seems like u an Kww spend a lot of time together tag teaming other editors.  I think the date of sentencing is important because it is the last, but most important, step of the criminal justice process.  Plus, people will want to know this.  After he gets sentenced the language would of course need to be changed to the present tense and not the present future tense.  But the info itself about her being a crime victim and of what crime is relevant.  The fact that she is getting a large and disproportionate share of the restitution shows that she was the major victim here.Stranded Pirate (talk) 01:06, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't realize that Kww and I spend a lot of time together. Nice to know. Your problem is you're obsessed with this case, I have no idea why. People who are interested in Chaney would be interested in knowing when he's going to be sentenced. People who are interested in Olstead would not be. You have to get a grip on why you're here at Wikipedia because frankly I don't see your contributions or comments as constructive.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:16, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I find the case extremely interesting on account of the boldness of the hacker and the fact that he hacked so many people's email accounts and got away with it for so long. Plus, something like this has never happened before. (Redacted) Stranded Pirate (talk) 05:33, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:ClaudiaLeeWiki.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ClaudiaLeeWiki.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:49, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:CarolineDAmore2013.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CarolineDAmore2013.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:51, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:SS Condenast.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SS Condenast.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:52, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Please do not continue to upload files with missing or false information on their copyright status, as you did with File:SS Condenast.jpg. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright and copyright infringement very seriously. Images and other media may only be uploaded and included if they meet the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:52, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:ClaudiaLeeLive.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ClaudiaLeeLive.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 18:18, 4 June 2013 (UTC)