User talk:Milliedeering7078

July 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Club Penguin, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Club Penguin was changed by Milliedeering7078 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851907 on 2012-07-09T21:08:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Club Penguin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Vertium '' When all is said and done 21:24, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Club Penguin
Hi, it's been pointed out to me that you might have been trying to make real edits to Club Penguin that I rolled back. If that's the case, please leave a message on my talk page so we can discuss. I'm happy to help new editors make better edits. Thanks. Vertium '' When all is said and done 22:04, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't read all of his/her edit. That's why I sent you that message. Sorry about that, Vertium. :) Ha  dg  er  22:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, WP:AGF tells me that it's possible the edits were done without the user having seen the Cluebot message. I'll remove my additional warning, which was a marginal decision in the first place. Nczempin (talk) 22:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Your edits, and your concern (don't worry about it)
Hello Milliedeering7078, there's nothing to worry about. Here's what happened: You made some test edits, and one automatic program and two other Wikipedia editors (one of them was me) thought they were unconstructive, reverted them and told you about the revert. Then another editor noticed that perhaps the other two editors were a little too harsh in their judgement. I for one reviewed my decision and agreed that was not intentionally unconstructive, so I took back my warning message. So basically it's all good. We are looking forward to your learning about Wikipedia and editing to improve the articles. -- Nczempin (talk) 21:36, 13 October 2012 (UTC)