User talk:Millyblue

Sockpuppet investigation
As I don't have the idea that you are a genuine editor, I have started an investigation: Sockpuppet investigations/Mrdhimas The Banner talk 11:26, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Miss Grand International 2014


A tag has been placed on Miss Grand International 2014, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Banner talk 13:29, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2014 Miss Grand International


A tag has been placed on 2014 Miss Grand International, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Banner talk 13:31, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your article Miss Grand International 14
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Miss Grand International 14 to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It currently has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 17:37, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Re-creation warning
Please stop trying to re-create the article about the 2014 Miss Grand International pageant under different titles. The article was deleted because of the consensus of the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Miss Grand International 2014; if you want to contest the article's deletion, the correct forum is deletion review.

Please note that repeated recreation of an article against a consensus to delete it is considered disruptive and is grounds for blocking your account. Thank you. Deor (talk) 17:58, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing of various kinds, including attempting to unilaterally overthrow consensus by repeatedly re-creating an article after a deletion discussion had led to a clear consensus for deletion, and using the trick of making trivial changes to the article's title when earlier titles were eventually protected to stop your disruption. I see that you have also removed other editors' talk page comments, evidently in a futile attempt to hide evidence of your disruptive actions. It also seems very likely that this account is a sockpuppet, or at the very least a meatpuppet. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:58, 14 October 2014 (UTC)