User talk:Milowerx

Normal pause
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Normal pause, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Normal pause fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: (CSD-A5) transwiki to http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/normal_pause To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Normal pause, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Normal pause itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mike Milo.jpg
Hi Milowerx!

We thank you for uploading Image:Mike Milo.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bloo's-Gang-title-page.jpg
Hi Milowerx!

We thank you for uploading Image:Bloo's-Gang-title-page.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Igs-title-page.jpg
Hi Milowerx!

We thank you for uploading Image:Igs-title-page.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

February 2009
When adding links to material on an external site, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Jay32183 (talk) 17:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

External link spam
You have added many external links to your own site to Wikipedia. Please stop adding advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. rspεεr (talk) 05:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

I am not spamming anything friend, merely linking to content that Wikipedia is talking about on any given page. It happens to be on my website yes but that should not matter. I am not spamming as I make no money from uploading the content. So if I happen to have directed or animated whole episodes of content that Wikipedia talks about, I should therefore be exempt from linking to it simply because you don't understand the definition of spamming? It is INFORMATION Sharing and that is the point of Wikipedia. Before you decide to call me such a strong word as a spammer check out my credentials and my website and you'll realize that the content is what is being referenced in the post and it is valid.Milowerx (Milowerx)