User talk:Min-Fan1/Traditional Chinese marriage/Bibliography

The first source is something that is over 100 years old. I do not think that this is a reasonable source that would provide up to date information on this topic. While I will give you credit for this source, because I did not think I needed to specify that your source be within this century, I will not give you any credit for further assignments if you use this source. You will have to find another one.

The second source does not relate to your topic. PRC marriage law does not fall within the scope of traditional Chinese marriage. -1

The same applies for your third source -1

The same applies to your fourth source which clearly states that it covers the period 1960-2012. This is clearly a period for which the term "traditional" does not apply. -1

The fifth source is from a novel. While it is printed by a university press, and so your mistake is somewhat understandable, this gives me the sense that you did not actually read any portion of this chapter as it would have been immediately apparent that it is not a scholarly article. While I will give you credit for this source, I will not give you any credit for further assignments if you use this source. You will have to find another one.

Your score is 2/5

You will have to find five new sources. The next assignment will require you to have read a suitable source, so please consider doing this before next week.

Please remember that your source needs to be in English, peer reviewed, and relatively current, 1980s and after preferably and that it needs to not simply fall into the category of "Chinese marriage" but traditional (meaning arranged and not self-selected) prior to 1930s. There are many articles on this subject and I do not find it reasonable that one does not exist, but that you have not looked carefully.Qiandaizi (talk) 15:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)