User talk:Min al Khadr

Welcome!
Hello, Min al Khadr, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Colorphobia, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! red dogsix (talk) 17:23, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Colorphobia


The article Colorphobia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 17:23, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Colorphobia


A tag has been placed on Colorphobia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. red dogsix (talk) 17:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm Legacypac. Your recent edit to the page Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''You may not categorize this rebel group as a country of any type. There are no reliable sources for that.'' Legacypac (talk) 09:06, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Phallophobia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phallophobia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Phallophobia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 10:17, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Please declare your previous account
Hi, looking at your contributions it is obvious that you are not a new user but must have edited wikipedia before. Please can you declare your previous account. If you are legitimately clean starting, you are welcome to email me with the details or register your previous account with the Arbitration Committee. Thanks Spartaz Humbug! 18:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I have only used ip's before, if that counts. Min al Khadr (talk) 13:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Btw, I got a ping from you. I should be deleted from that canvass list since I don't know any of them. I reached the AFD page from a deletion sorting page on a previous AFD I participated in. You would be engaging in timewasting by pursuing an imaginative fairytale. Min al Khadr (talk) 13:55, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cape Town, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page African. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Phallophobia
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Phallophobia, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://deletionpedia.org/en/Phallophobia.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Phallophobia


A tag has been placed on Phallophobia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 19:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Phallophobia
Hey there. I noticed you removed the construction tag. Are you confident that the reasons for a delete consensus have been overcome? I'm not going to nominate it for AfD; it looks good to me, but someone else might. - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 00:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I also sort of feel its ready, but I am willing to improve it if anyone objects to its current state. there are about four more quality sources I could conceivably introduce. Min al Khadr (talk) 00:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm a bit scared that someone's going to afd it. Min al Khadr (talk) 00:24, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Shiite Caliphates has been nominated for discussion
Category:Shiite Caliphates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Constantine  ✍  19:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Sunni Caliphates has been nominated for discussion
Category:Sunni Caliphates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Constantine  ✍  19:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Leukophobia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leukophobia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Leukophobia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)