User talk:Mindcircus ca

Adlib software
Hi. I have declined the most recent speedy request on this article, as I believe that the references warrant wider review. I'm dropping you a line because I'm not at all confident that this article would survive a deletion discussion in its current form. I have spent some time attempting to locate additional sources, but have failed. If you are able to add more, please do. Keep in mind that sources do not necessarily need to be accessible online. WP:CORP offers as an example of good evidence of notability a feature article on HP in Palo Alto Weekly. Depth, breadth and importance of sources often do factor into deletion discussions, but feature articles in regional publications can be used to help document that a company is of encyclopedic notability. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Adlib software
A tag has been placed on Adlib software requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JASpencer (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)