User talk:Mindthegap99

open an investigation into me if your belief is I’m LisaHadley2018 but avoid falling into the trappings of WP:DNB – like wikitigresito – or WP:PA; WIKIPEDIA expects editors to assume good faith at all times. Furthermore I’m not going to get into a debate over my belief that the editors who have put both A Case for Murder: Brittany Murphy Files and The Complete History of The Howling articles up for deletion have been inconsistent. It is as clear as day in both deletion threads and I’m struggling to see why other editors can’t see that; I’m assuming it’s selective! As an outsider looking in, this debate is nothing but a shambles and falls into WP:GAME and WP: DE. Both articles have multiple reliable secondary sources and are both notable. My opinions are non-biased as I’m independent of this situation, and I voted to keep because the articles fit into WIKIPEDIA’s expectations of its uploads. The state of this deletion debate relies on falsehoods ( WP:GAME and WP: DE ) and I feel in the long run will affect WIKIPEDIA’s reputation due to a small minority of editors who use WP:GAME, WP: DE and at times WP:PA to suit their scenario. I have said what I need to say on the subject matters and I hope all editors taking part in the articles’ promotion for deletion re-read the fundamental principles of Wikipedia, WP:NBOOKS and WP:GNG; there still is a clear lack of understanding or a deliberate lack of understanding, and it’s a shame. These articles have multiple reliable secondary sources and are both notable and deserve a place in Wikipedia!
 * They told me plaid socks go with only plain-color pants, while plain-color socks can go with anything. Well, I think fashion tips are funny; but I'd welcome an expert opinion. -The Gnome (talk) 11:06, 3 June 2018 (UTC)