User talk:Minecraft Kidtech

Speedy deletion nomination of Minecraftserer
A tag has been placed on Minecraftserer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wer900 talkessay on the definition of consensus 23:56, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The subject of your article is not an appropriate topic for Wikipedia. This list of really, really, really stupid article ideas that you really, really, really should not create and our policy regarding what Wikipedia is not address the subject exhaustively. In particular, you have not demonstrated notability per our guidelines - that is, on Wikipedia, the answer to life, the Universe, and everything. Please take the time to read our policies and guidelines and familiarize yourself with them. Follow them, and we hope to see you as a legitimate contributor to our encyclopedia. Otherwise, the community will frown upon you and you will not be welcomed onto this site, perhaps blocked. Please don't use Wikipedia to self-promote. That is contrary to the purpose of an encyclopedia whose purpose it is to present and disseminate all notable topics with an accurate and balanced accounting for all opinions on a subject. Thank you. Wer900  talkessay on the definition of consensus 22:47, 9 May 2012 (UTC)