User talk:Mineralwaterisgreat

Username
Yes, this username is fine, although I have one other concern, from the last username, you were editing the BNP article with extremely similar edits to an IP address that was blocked earlier on today. I am giving you the benefit of doubt here, but please read our neutral point of view guidlines and edit in a more constructive manor than you did from the last username.  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  19:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. IrishGuy talk 21:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Then why is he not blocked as well? It takes two to edit war. He's also a pretty poor editor; just look at his latest reply on your page, accusing me of providing no sources when I gave TWO new ones to support the facts. The rest of his reply is just an attempt to sideline my opinion by making me look redundant and he might as well have called me a complete moron Mineralwaterisgreat 21:49, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Radical right-wing populism
The reference provided does not back up the information you added. Please refrain from adding original research to articles, this violates our core policies. One Night In Hackney 303  21:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:WEASEL. One Night In Hackney  303  01:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to British National Party. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Goodnight mush Talk  01:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I reverted your edits because they seemed to be OR or unjustified as the rest of the article did not discuss them as a fascist group. More informed editors on the specific topic seem to be discussing it on the talk page with you now, so I will leave it to you and them to reach a final consensus. Please beware of violating WP:3RR, and I hope you and they are able to reach an agreement. Goodnight mush Talk  02:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. - A l is o n  ☺ 01:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 02:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Radical right-wing populism
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. The source provided does not back up your change at all. One Night In Hackney 303  00:40, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

British National Party
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. One Night In Hackney 303  01:01, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

This is your only warning. The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.  Wikihermit  (Talk • HermesBot) 01:06, 9 June 2007 (UTC)