User talk:Mini.licc/Gary Hamel

Hi Mini.licc! I just finished a peer review of the Gary Hamel article, and I posted my response on the peer review page, but I thought I would also post it here.

The Lead of the article states who Gary Hamel is and what he is most known for. It doesn't state anything else, so it is really short. It needs a summary of what the article is going to be about.

The content of the article is very limited. It just states where he went to school, and where he has worked. It states some facts about Hamel and his work, but it doesn't give any details about the importance of each statement. There needs to be a more detailed explanation of his work and why it was important.

The tone of this article is very neutral. This is mostly because the article just states facts about Hamel's life. I do not see any instances of bias.

The links to the sources do work. However, the most recent source appears to be from 2015. If possible, it would be good to have some more recent sources.

The organization is minimal because there is not much information. There are only a few categories of content, but they are nicely organized.

There is a good quality picture of Hamel at the top of the article.

Overall, I would say this article is a great start, but that it needs more information. Airplane Rat (talk) 06:58, 20 November 2023 (UTC)