User talk:Minnellium

AfD nomination of Tubular tyres
I have nominated Tubular tyres, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Tubular tyres. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Madcoverboy (talk) 02:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Retail Distribution Review
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Retail Distribution Review, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/about/what/rdr/index.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Retail Distribution Review
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Retail Distribution Review, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/about/what/rdr/index.shtml, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Retail Distribution Review and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later and Creative Commons Share Alike (CC-BY-SA), versions 3.0 or later, under CC-BY-SA, versions 3.0 or later, or that the material is released into the public domain'' leave a note at Talk:Retail Distribution Review with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA, and note that you have done so on Talk:Retail Distribution Review. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Retail Distribution Review saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!

''Note: Normally this article should be deleted. You appear to be making a genuine effort to address the issues though, so I took the liberty to blank the content for the time being to leave you time to address the concerns. In short, your paraphrasing remains extremely close of the original, which is still a copyright concern. I recommend you start over from scratch, in your own words without copy / pasting anything from the original site on the temporary subpage linked just above, then make a note on the article's talk page. The best way is probably to read the original entirely, then sum it up in your own words. You will lose details this way, but this will give you means to express things which are your own, rather than someone else's reworded content. If you need any assistance, don't hesitate to add helpme here or leave me a message on my talk page.'' MLauba (talk) 14:26, 3 July 2009 (UTC)