User talk:Minnesotablues

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laurie Lambrecht (June 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laurie Lambrecht and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Laurie_Lambrecht Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Greenman&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Laurie_Lambrecht reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:48, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Laurie Lambrecht has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Laurie Lambrecht. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 11:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laurie Lambrecht has been accepted
 Laurie Lambrecht, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Laurie_Lambrecht help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Spinster300 (talk) 11:38, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Art Forum Ute Barth (December 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lewcm was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Art Forum Ute Barth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Art_Forum_Ute_Barth Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lewcm&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Art_Forum_Ute_Barth reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lewcm Talk to me! 01:46, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Maja Malmcrona
Hello, Minnesotablues. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maja Malmcrona, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Art Salon Zürich
Hello, Minnesotablues. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Art Salon Zürich, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Art Forum Ute Barth (February 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Art Forum Ute Barth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Art_Forum_Ute_Barth Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Herald&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Art_Forum_Ute_Barth reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Art Forum Ute Barth (April 20)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Art_Forum_Ute_Barth Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:ORG / WP:ORGDEPTH. --

K.e.coffman (talk) 04:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello Minnesotablues. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Art Forum Ute Barth, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Minnesotablues. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi K.e.coffman! Thank you for your message and concern. I am not receiving any compensation—I am new to Wiki editing and still learning, I am sorry I am giving off this impression. Let me know if you have any other questions. Thank you! Minnesotablues (talk) 06:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for letting me know. Since you're just gaining experience, you might want contribute to existing articles first, before creating new ones. Separately, private galleries are rarely wiki-notable; you might want to focus on museums instead, for example. --K.e.coffman (talk) 06:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Understood. Thank you! Minnesotablues (talk) 06:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)